These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17076068)

  • 1. Information processing during face recognition: the effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman J; Intriligator JM
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1089-105. PubMed ID: 17076068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Scan patterns during the processing of facial identity in prosopagnosia.
    Barton JJ; Radcliffe N; Cherkasova MV; Edelman JA
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Aug; 181(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 17361425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fixation location on upright and inverted faces modulates the N170.
    de Lissa P; McArthur G; Hawelka S; Palermo R; Mahajan Y; Hutzler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():1-11. PubMed ID: 24607846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification.
    Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aberrant first fixations when looking at inverted faces in various poses: the result of the centre-of-gravity effect?
    Hills PJ; Sullivan AJ; Pake JM
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Nov; 103(4):520-38. PubMed ID: 23034110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How dogs scan familiar and inverted faces: an eye movement study.
    Somppi S; Törnqvist H; Hänninen L; Krause CM; Vainio O
    Anim Cogn; 2014 May; 17(3):793-803. PubMed ID: 24305996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human spontaneous gaze patterns in viewing of faces of different species.
    Guo K; Tunnicliffe D; Roebuck H
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 20515000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.
    Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The inversion effect on gaze perception reflects processing of component information.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Fischer MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16082532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental origins of the face inversion effect.
    Cashon CH; Holt NA
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2015; 48():117-50. PubMed ID: 25735943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is the Thatcher Illusion Modulated by Face Familiarity? Evidence from an Eye Tracking Study.
    Utz S; Carbon CC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163933. PubMed ID: 27776145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Viewpoint invariance in the discrimination of upright and inverted faces.
    Wright A; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2008 Nov; 48(25):2545-54. PubMed ID: 18804486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Face race and sex impact visual fixation strategies for upright and inverted faces in 3- to 6-year-old children.
    Farrell J; Conte S; Barry-Anwar R; Scott LS
    Dev Psychobiol; 2023 Mar; 65(2):e22362. PubMed ID: 36811376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tracking the truth: the effect of face familiarity on eye fixations during deception.
    Millen AE; Hope L; Hillstrom AP; Vrij A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):930-943. PubMed ID: 27064964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.
    Sekuler AB; Gaspar CM; Gold JM; Bennett PJ
    Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(5):391-6. PubMed ID: 15028214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration.
    Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ
    Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.