BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17076583)

  • 1. Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation.
    Naidoo R; Ricketts TH
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(11):e360. PubMed ID: 17076583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity.
    Schröter M; Rusch GM; Barton DN; Blumentrath S; Nordén B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112557. PubMed ID: 25393951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collateral biodiversity benefits associated with 'free-market' approaches to sustainable land use and forestry activities.
    Koziell I; Swingland IR
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1807-16. PubMed ID: 12460499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.
    Egoh BN; Reyers B; Carwardine J; Bode M; O'Farrell PJ; Wilson KA; Possingham HP; Rouget M; de Lange W; Richardson DM; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):1021-30. PubMed ID: 20136871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling opportunity costs of conservation in transitional landscapes.
    Naidoo R; Adamowicz WL
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Apr; 20(2):490-500. PubMed ID: 16903110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial trade-offs between ecological and economical sustainability in the boreal production forest.
    Mazziotta A; Borges P; Kangas A; Halme P; Eyvindson K
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Mar; 330():117144. PubMed ID: 36586374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes.
    Gonzalez-Redin J; Luque S; Poggio L; Smith R; Gimona A
    Environ Res; 2016 Jan; 144(Pt B):15-26. PubMed ID: 26597639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
    Schröter M; Kraemer R; Ceauşu S; Rusch GM
    Ambio; 2017 Nov; 46(7):756-768. PubMed ID: 28503701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.
    Sutton NJ; Armsworth PR
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1451-61. PubMed ID: 25381868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar.
    Neugarten RA; Honzák M; Carret P; Koenig K; Andriamaro L; Cano CA; Grantham HS; Hole D; Juhn D; McKinnon M; Rasolohery A; Steininger M; Wright TM; Turner WR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0168575. PubMed ID: 28006005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture.
    Carrasco LR; Webb EL; Symes WS; Koh LP; Sodhi NS
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):e2001657. PubMed ID: 28732022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of economic forest ecosystem services in China].
    Wang B; Lu SW
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2009 Feb; 20(2):417-25. PubMed ID: 19459385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation.
    Ferraro PJ; Hanauer MM; Miteva DA; Nelson JL; Pattanayak SK; Nolte C; Sims KR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7420-5. PubMed ID: 26082549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts.
    Faith DP; Walker PA
    J Biosci; 2002 Jul; 27(4 Suppl 2):393-407. PubMed ID: 12177537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
    Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-objective forest restoration planning in Costa Rica: Balancing landscape connectivity and ecosystem service provisioning with sustainable development.
    Morán-Ordóñez A; Hermoso V; Martínez-Salinas A
    J Environ Manage; 2022 May; 310():114717. PubMed ID: 35217445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: targeted benefits vs. co-benefits or costs?
    Chan KM; Hoshizaki L; Klinkenberg B
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24378. PubMed ID: 21915318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Costs and benefits of protecting linear landscape elements: Applying systematic conservation planning on a case study in the Netherlands.
    Aschi F; Dekker SC; van Vuuren DP; Bogaart PW; Rijsdijk KF; van Loon EE
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Dec; 348():119262. PubMed ID: 37866179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity.
    Venter O; Laurance WF; Iwamura T; Wilson KA; Fuller RA; Possingham HP
    Science; 2009 Dec; 326(5958):1368. PubMed ID: 19965752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.