These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17077366)

  • 1. Health experts denounce EPA's soot limits.
    Mitka M
    JAMA; 2006 Nov; 296(17):2078. PubMed ID: 17077366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Car emissions are EPA's problem.
    Marris E
    Nature; 2007 Apr; 446(7136):589. PubMed ID: 17410142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decent proposal? EPA's new clean air standards.
    Brown KS
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Apr; 105(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 9189700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "The mercury's rising!" Can national health group intervention protect the public health from EPA'S Clean Air Mercury Rule?
    Stivers JD
    J Leg Med; 2006 Sep; 27(3):323-40. PubMed ID: 16959655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Policy: EPA's ground-level ozone standard redux.
    Weinhold B
    Environ Health Perspect; 2010 Mar; 118(3):A 115. PubMed ID: 20194066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EPA's PM2.5 program criticized.
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Aug; 106(8):A373-4. PubMed ID: 9867460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EPA's New Ozone Air Quality Standard: Why Should We Care?
    Balmes JR
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Nov; 14(11):1627-1629. PubMed ID: 28977755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sustained undermining of science by the EPA's leaders is a travesty.
    Nature; 2020 May; 581(7806):7-8. PubMed ID: 32372045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EPA: airing on the side of caution or pulling standards out of thin Air?
    Breslin K
    Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Apr; 108(4):A176-7. PubMed ID: 10753106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The public health benefits of air pollution control.
    Li J; Ewart G; Kraft M; Finn PW
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2012 Jul; 130(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 22521246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EPA's new rules on incinerators: more costs but no real benefits.
    Doucet LG
    Health Facil Manage; 1994 Oct; 7(10):78-80, 82. PubMed ID: 10137884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Smog and soot: updating air quality standards.
    Browner CM
    Public Health Rep; 1997; 112(5):366-7. PubMed ID: 9323386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A particle is not a particle is not a PARTICLE.
    Mage DT
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2002 Mar; 12(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 11965525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attack on protections against air pollution.
    Lipsman J; Frank AL
    Am J Prev Med; 2011 Dec; 41(6):645-7. PubMed ID: 22099244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
    Batavia MK
    J S C Med Assoc; 1991 Feb; 87(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 2010990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review and critique of the EPA's rationale for a fine particle standard.
    Moolgavkar SH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jun; 42(1):123-44. PubMed ID: 15896449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulators face questioning on particulate rules.
    Reichhardt T
    Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6569):11-2. PubMed ID: 8598893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory policy. EPA draws fire over air-review revisions.
    Stokstad E
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1672-3. PubMed ID: 17170267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speeding up the EPA review process.
    Peacock M
    Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5821):53. PubMed ID: 17412939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Anti-environment Bush.
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6375):177-8. PubMed ID: 1589000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.