BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17077723)

  • 1. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.
    Matsumura A; Taneichi H; Suda K; Kajino T; Moridaira H; Kaneda K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):E871-6. PubMed ID: 17077723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiological comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two closed-box plasmapore coated titanium cages: follow-up study over more than seven years.
    Kroppenstedt S; Gulde M; Schönmayr R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(19):2083-8. PubMed ID: 18758364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JS; Kang BU; Lee SH; Jung B; Choi YG; Jeon SH; Lee HY
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 19342933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral implantation of low-profile interbody fusion cages: subsidence, lordosis, and fusion analysis.
    Schiffman M; Brau SA; Henderson R; Gimmestad G
    Spine J; 2003; 3(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 14588950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
    Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterolateral fusion with interbody for lumbar spondylolisthesis is associated with less repeat surgery than posterolateral fusion alone.
    Macki M; Bydon M; Weingart R; Sciubba D; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Witham T
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 138():117-23. PubMed ID: 26318363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Circumferential fusion: a comparative analysis between anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Tye EY; Tanenbaum JE; Alonso AS; Xiao R; Steinmetz MP; Mroz TE; Savage JW
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):464-471. PubMed ID: 28821444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mini-open versus conventional open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of paraspinal muscle damage and slip reduction.
    Tsutsumimoto T; Shimogata M; Ohta H; Misawa H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):1923-8. PubMed ID: 19652636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective Study of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Either Interbody Graft or Interbody Cage in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Sivaraman A; Altaf F; Jalgaonkar A; Kakkar R; Sirigiri PB; Howieson A; Crawford RJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Oct; 28(8):E467-71. PubMed ID: 23839022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Which Approach Is Advantageous to Preventing Development of Adjacent Segment Disease? Comparative Analysis of 3 Different Lumbar Interbody Fusion Techniques (ALIF, LLIF, and PLIF) in L4-5 Spondylolisthesis.
    Lee CW; Yoon KJ; Ha SS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Sep; 105():612-622. PubMed ID: 28602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of posterolateral fusion with and without additional posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Ha KY; Na KH; Shin JH; Kim KW
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18525481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Outcomes of Anterior, Posterior, and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery at a Single Lumbar Level with Degenerative Spinal Disease.
    Lee N; Kim KN; Yi S; Ha Y; Shin DA; Yoon DH; Kim KS
    World Neurosurg; 2017 May; 101():216-226. PubMed ID: 28189865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cage migration in spondylolisthesis treated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using BAK cages.
    Chen L; Yang H; Tang T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2171-5. PubMed ID: 16205342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Madan SS; Boeree NR
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Dec; 12(6):567-75. PubMed ID: 14673717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for cage retropulsion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of 1070 cases.
    Kimura H; Shikata J; Odate S; Soeda T; Yamamura S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):1164-9. PubMed ID: 22647991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the correlative factors in the selection of interbody fusion cage height in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang H; Chen W; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jan; 17():9. PubMed ID: 26754610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.