103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17077736)
1. Segmental motor paralysis after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study.
Sakaura H; Hosono N; Mukai Y; Fujii R; Iwasaki M; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(23):2684-8. PubMed ID: 17077736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of motor dominant C5 paralysis after laminoplasty from the results of evoked spinal cord responses.
Kaneko K; Hashiguchi A; Kato Y; Kojima T; Imajyo Y; Taguchi T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jul; 19(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 16826009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preoperative spinal cord damage affects the characteristics and prognosis of segmental motor paralysis after cervical decompression surgery.
Ikegami S; Tsutsumimoto T; Ohta H; Yui M; Kosaku H; Uehara M; Misawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):463-8. PubMed ID: 24365903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative segmental C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty may occur without intraoperative nerve injury: a prospective study with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials.
Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Fujiwara Y; Kamei N; Ochi M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):3013-7. PubMed ID: 17172998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of segmental motor paralysis after cervical laminoplasty using intraoperative spinal cord monitoring with transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials.
Nakamae T; Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Kamei N; Izumi B; Fujioka Y; Ohta R; Ochi M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr; 25(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 22454184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and MRI predictors of outcome after surgical intervention for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
Alafifi T; Kern R; Fehlings M
J Neuroimaging; 2007 Oct; 17(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 17894620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion.
Hasegawa K; Homma T; Chiba Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E197-202. PubMed ID: 17413460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients.
Sasso RC; Smucker JD; Hacker RJ; Heller JG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2933-40; discussion 2941-2. PubMed ID: 18091483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic evaluation of the spinal cord in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using a kinematic magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Miura J; Doita M; Miyata K; Marui T; Nishida K; Fujii M; Kurosaka M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Feb; 22(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19190428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty.
Kato M; Nakamura H; Konishi S; Dohzono S; Toyoda H; Fukushima W; Kondo K; Matsuda H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jun; 33(14):E455-9. PubMed ID: 18552659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neurologic level diagnosis of cervical stenotic myelopathy.
Seichi A; Takeshita K; Kawaguchi H; Matsudaira K; Higashikawa A; Ogata N; Nakamura K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(12):1338-43. PubMed ID: 16721296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The correlation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cervical compression myelopathy with neurologic and radiologic severity.
Aota Y; Niwa T; Uesugi M; Yamashita T; Inoue T; Saito T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(7):814-20. PubMed ID: 18379411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spinal cord shift on magnetic resonance imaging at 24 hours after cervical laminoplasty.
Shiozaki T; Otsuka H; Nakata Y; Yokoyama T; Takeuchi K; Ono A; Numasawa T; Wada K; Toh S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):274-9. PubMed ID: 19179922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.
Chiba K; Ogawa Y; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Maruiwa H; Matsumoto M; Toyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 17172996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty.
Suk KS; Kim KT; Lee JH; Lee SH; Lim YJ; Kim JS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E656-60. PubMed ID: 17978640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty: a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up.
Hyun SJ; Rhim SC; Roh SW; Kang SH; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1134-9. PubMed ID: 19444059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized, prospective, and controlled clinical trial of pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for cervical fusion.
Foley KT; Mroz TE; Arnold PM; Chandler HC; Dixon RA; Girasole GJ; Renkens KL; Riew KD; Sasso RC; Smith RC; Tung H; Wecht DA; Whiting DM
Spine J; 2008; 8(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 17983841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative lumbar epidural hematoma: does size really matter?
Sokolowski MJ; Garvey TA; Perl J; Sokolowski MS; Akesen B; Mehbod AA; Mullaney KJ; Dykes DC; Transfeldt EE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 18165757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laminoplasty and skip laminectomy for cervical compressive myelopathy: range of motion, postoperative neck pain, and surgical outcomes in a randomized prospective study.
Yukawa Y; Kato F; Ito K; Horie Y; Hida T; Ito Z; Matsuyama Y
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):1980-5. PubMed ID: 17700444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
