These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078047)

  • 1. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible.
    Al-Sukhun J; Lindqvist C; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 17078047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orbital stress analysis, part V: systematic approach to validate a finite element model of a human orbit.
    Al-sukhun J; Penttilä H; Ashammakhi N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 May; 23(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 22565871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. I. Mathematical validation and experimental verification.
    Al-Sukhun J; Kelleway J; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):234-46. PubMed ID: 17078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible.
    Korioth TW; Romilly DP; Hannam AG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 May; 88(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 1510115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 17590159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT.
    Liao SH; Tong RF; Dong JX
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Jan; 32(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17951028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-element modeling of the anthropoid mandible: the effects of altered boundary conditions.
    Marinescu R; Daegling DJ; Rapoff AJ
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2005 Apr; 283(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 15747352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Creation of a three-dimensional model of the mandible and the TMJ in vivo by means of the finite element method.
    Castaño MC; Zapata U; Pedroza A; Jaramillo JD; Roldán S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2002; 5(2-3):87-99. PubMed ID: 12680039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elastic properties and masticatory bone stress in the macaque mandible.
    Dechow PC; Hylander WL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Aug; 112(4):553-74. PubMed ID: 10918129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orbital stress analysis: part II: design and fixation of autogenous bone graft used to repair orbital blowout fracture.
    Al-Sukhun J; Penttilä H; Ashammakhi N
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 22(4):1294-8. PubMed ID: 21772199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries.
    Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A three-dimensional computer model of the human mandible in two simulated standard trauma situations.
    Gallas Torreira M; Fernandez JR
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2004 Oct; 32(5):303-7. PubMed ID: 15458672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.