BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078048)

  • 1. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. I. Mathematical validation and experimental verification.
    Al-Sukhun J; Kelleway J; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):234-46. PubMed ID: 17078048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. II. Variables affecting the predictive behavior of a finite element model of a human mandible.
    Al-Sukhun J; Lindqvist C; Helenius M
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jan; 80(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 17078047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanics of the mandible part I: measurement of mandibular functional deformation using custom-fabricated displacement transducers.
    Al-Sukhun J; Helenius M; Lindqvist C; Kelleway J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1015-22. PubMed ID: 16781333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanics of the mandible: Part II. Development of a 3-dimensional finite element model to study mandibular functional deformation in subjects treated with dental implants.
    Al-Sukhun J; Kelleway J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):455-66. PubMed ID: 17622013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Functional mandibular deformation in edentulous subjects treated with dental implants.
    Abdel-Latif HH; Hobkirk JA; Kelleway JP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(6):513-9. PubMed ID: 11203678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical rationale for intentionally inclined implants in the posterior mandible using 3D finite element analysis.
    Satoh T; Maeda Y; Komiyama Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 16161737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Experimental and finite-element models for the assessment of mandibular deformation under mechanical loading].
    Meyer U; Vollmer D; Homann C; Schuon R; Benthaus S; Végh A; Felszegi E; Joos U; Piffkò J
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 Jan; 4(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10662914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orbital stress analysis--Part I: Simulation of orbital deformation following blunt injury by finite element analysis method.
    Al-Sukhun J; Kontio R; Lindqvist C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):434-42. PubMed ID: 16487806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of the dentate human mandible.
    Korioth TW; Romilly DP; Hannam AG
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 May; 88(1):69-96. PubMed ID: 1510115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique.
    van Staden RC; Guan H; Johnson NW; Loo YC; Meredith N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 18081871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threaded versus porous-surfaced implants as anchorage units for orthodontic treatment: three-dimensional finite element analysis of peri-implant bone tissue stresses.
    Pilliar RM; Sagals G; Meguid SA; Oyonarte R; Deporter DA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 17190297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite-element modeling of the anthropoid mandible: the effects of altered boundary conditions.
    Marinescu R; Daegling DJ; Rapoff AJ
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2005 Apr; 283(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 15747352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
    Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: a two-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Zampelis A; Rangert B; Heijl L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S35-43. PubMed ID: 17618932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of change in occlusal contact areas of the mandibular second molar on temporomandibular joint stress distribution: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis].
    Zhang Y; Wang MQ; Ling W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 40(4):291-3. PubMed ID: 16191369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants.
    Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigation of bone inelastic response in interaction phenomena with dental implants.
    Natali AN; Carniel EL; Pavan PG
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 18207565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Finite element analysis of the biomechanics of human mandible in response to impact force].
    Liu Y; Li JY; Zhao WD
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2008 Jan; 28(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 18227031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.