These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078280)

  • 1. Comparison of K hand files and ProFiles 0.06/0.04 in simulated curved root canals prepared by students.
    Steffen H; Löw A; Rosin M; Welk A
    Quintessence Int; 2006; 37(10):811-7. PubMed ID: 17078280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of procedural errors resulting during root canal preparations completed by senior dental students in patients using an '8-step method' versus 'serial step-back technique'.
    Kfir A; Rosenberg E; Zuckerman O; Tamse A; Fuss Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jun; 97(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 15184858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three instrumentation techniques in the preparation of simulated curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 1996 Sep; 29(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 9206414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation of curved root canals with rotary FlexMaster instruments compared to Lightspeed instruments and NiTi hand files.
    Weiger R; Brückner M; ElAyouti A; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2003 Jul; 36(7):483-90. PubMed ID: 12823704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in vitro comparison of the Excalibur handpiece and hand instrumentation in curved root canals.
    Cheung GS; Chan AW
    J Endod; 1996 Mar; 22(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 8618094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hand and nickel-titanium root canal instrumentation performed by dental students: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Peru M; Peru C; Mannocci F; Sherriff M; Buchanan LS; Pitt Ford TR
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2006 Feb; 10(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16436085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root canal shaping using rotary nickel-titanium files in preclinical dental education in Turkey.
    Ünal GÇ; Maden M; Orhan EO; Sarıtekin E; Teke A
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Apr; 76(4):509-13. PubMed ID: 22473564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.
    Gluskin AH; Brown DC; Buchanan LS
    Int Endod J; 2001 Sep; 34(6):476-84. PubMed ID: 11556516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the instrumentation technique and apical preparation diameter on calcium hydroxide filling in simulated curved canals.
    Vier-Pelisser FV; Meng A; Benedete Netto LC; Só MV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):784-8. PubMed ID: 23649064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper.
    Bürklein S; Hinschitza K; Dammaschke T; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 22188401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomographic study.
    Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
    J Endod; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1860-4. PubMed ID: 25205262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a new nickel-titanium system to create the glide path in root canal preparation of curved canals.
    D'Amario M; Baldi M; Petricca R; De Angelis F; El Abed R; D'Arcangelo C
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1581-4. PubMed ID: 24238451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Root canal transportation with a Ni-Ti rotary file system and stainless steel hand files in simulated root canals.
    Loizides A; Eliopoulos D; Kontakiotis E
    Quintessence Int; 2006 May; 37(5):369-74. PubMed ID: 16683684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
    Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
    Chen JL; Messer HH
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.