These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078306)
61. [The biological effect of radiation with various frequency of impulses]. Skuratovich AA Med Radiol (Mosk); 1966 Nov; 11(11):41-3. PubMed ID: 5996580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Investigating the potential of polymer gel dosimetry for interventional radiology: first results. Antoniou PE; Bousbouras P; Sandaltzopoulos R; Kaldoudi E Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(8):N127-36. PubMed ID: 18364553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Charge collection efficiency in ionization chambers exposed to electron beams with high dose per pulse. Laitano RF; Guerra AS; Pimpinella M; Caporali C; Petrucci A Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(24):6419-36. PubMed ID: 17148826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Progress in research on radiation combined injury in China. Zou Z; Sun H; Su Y; Cheng T; Luo C Radiat Res; 2008 Jun; 169(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 18494547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. A theoretical approach for non-equilibrium radiation dosimetry. Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jul; 53(13):3493-9. PubMed ID: 18552420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Molecular basic data calculation for radiation transport in chromatin. Peudon A; Edel S; Terrissol M Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):128-35. PubMed ID: 17166876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Experimental determination of pCo perturbation factors for plane-parallel chambers. Kapsch RP; Bruggmoser G; Christ G; Dohm OS; Hartmann GH; Schüle E Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7167-81. PubMed ID: 18030000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Potential clinical utility of a fibre optic-coupled dosemeter for dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. Jones AK; Hintenlang D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18845674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Federal regulations (effective June 2006) require dose monitors on all new fluoroscopes: how will this help clinicians keep track of patient dose? Balter S; Detorie NA; Mahesh M J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Feb; 4(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 17412246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Evaluation of the calibration procedure of active personal dosemeters for interventional radiology. Bordy JM; Daures J; Clairand I; Denozière M; Donadille L; d'Errico F; Gouriou J; Itié C; Struelens L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 18757898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Peculiarities of the damaging effect of uneven x-radiation]. Avetisov GM; Darenskaja NG Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1967; 8(1):109-20. PubMed ID: 6078722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Monte Carlo study of the dependence of the KAP-meter calibration coefficient on beam aperture, x-ray tube voltage and reference plane. Malusek A; Larsson JP; Carlsson GA Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1157-70. PubMed ID: 17264377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Radiation-induced adaptive response in fish cell lines. Ryan LA; Seymour CB; O'Neill-Mehlenbacher A; Mothersill CE J Environ Radioact; 2008 Apr; 99(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 18054128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Experimental studies of the relative biological effectiveness of accelerated charged particles varying in energy]. Fedorenko BS; Petrov VM; Smirnova OA; Vorozhtsova SV; Abrosimova AN Aviakosm Ekolog Med; 2006; 40(3):55-63. PubMed ID: 17193971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Experimental determination of the distribution of dose rate around punctiform radioactive particles. Schmidt-Burbach GM Health Phys; 1970 Mar; 18(3):295-6. PubMed ID: 5424608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. [A device for studying relative dose distributions]. Akatkin OA; Pozdniakov PE Med Radiol (Mosk); 1971 Mar; 16(3):77-80. PubMed ID: 5567613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Sodium dependence of bioelectric outputs in rat stomach. CUMMINS JT; VAUGHAN BE Res Dev Tech Rep; 1963 Jan; ():10. PubMed ID: 14024245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Why the utility of a normalized dose-response gradient (gamma-factor) should be redefined. Suwinski R; Withers HR Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Sep; 42(2):463. PubMed ID: 9788429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. [Design of an experiment studying the dose-time dependence of an effect of a combination of adverse factors]. Katul'skiĭ IuN Gig Sanit; 2006; (4):81-3. PubMed ID: 17078306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]