127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078517)
1. Consent for organ and tissue retention in British law in the light of the Human Tissue Act 2004.
Mavroforou A; Giannoukas A; Michalodimitrakis E
Med Law; 2006 Sep; 25(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 17078517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human tissue legislation: listening to the professionals.
Campbell AV; McLean SA; Gutridge K; Harper H
J Med Ethics; 2008 Feb; 34(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 18234949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whose brain is it anyway? The comparative law of post-mortem organ retention.
Klaiman MH
J Leg Med; 2005 Dec; 26(4):475-90. PubMed ID: 16303735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consent or property? Dealing with the body and its parts in the shadow of Bristol and Alder Hey.
Mason K; Laurie G
Mod Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 64(5):710-29. PubMed ID: 12741391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summit signals a change in the law on organ retention.
Abbasi K
BMJ; 2001 Jan; 322(7279):125. PubMed ID: 11159558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IN SEARCH OF A FATHER: LEGAL CHALLENGES SURROUNDING POSTHUMOUS PATERNITY TESTING.
Stirton RH; Wilkinson MJ
Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(4):531-55. PubMed ID: 26547085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AB v Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust.
Great Britain. England and Wales. Supreme Court of Judicature, Queen's Bench Division
Fam Law Rep; 2004; 2():365-439. PubMed ID: 17042108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The ethics of donation: changes are necessary and soon.
Galea G; Pegg D
Lancet; 2003 Sep; 362(9388):932. PubMed ID: 14511924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Challenges to the implementation of the new Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2005: experience from a tertiary paediatric pathology centre.
Palmer RN
Med Sci Law; 2008 Jul; 48(3):269-70. PubMed ID: 18754218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Patients' rights of the deceased and related problems in Hungarian law].
Kereszty EM
Orv Hetil; 2012 Mar; 153(9):330-8. PubMed ID: 22348848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenges to implementation of the Coroners (Amendment) Rules 2005: coroners' and pathologists' perspectives.
Weber MA; Ashworth MT; Malone M; Sebire NJ
Med Sci Law; 2008 Oct; 48(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 19051676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The law relating to dealing with dead bodies.
White S
Med Law Int; 2000; 4(3-4):145-81. PubMed ID: 15040359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consent and nothing but consent? The organ retention scandal.
Sheach Leith VM
Sociol Health Illn; 2007 Nov; 29(7):1023-42. PubMed ID: 18092981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inquiry finds brains were removed without consent.
Mayor S
BMJ; 2003 May; 326(7398):1051. PubMed ID: 12750185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons from cadaveric research in the UK.
Mountney J; Parnham J
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Jul; (189):13-7. PubMed ID: 14983865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anticipating the Redfern inquiry: a historical note about tissue retention and consent.
McNeish AS
J Clin Pathol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):958-9. PubMed ID: 19783729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. British transplant research endangered by the Human Tissue Act.
Cronin AJ; Rose ML; Dark JH; Douglas JF
J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):512-4. PubMed ID: 21546519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary.
Crosthwaite J
N Z Bioeth J; 2003 Feb; 4(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Organ retention for research: the Isaacs Report.
Department of Health
Bull Med Ethics; 2003 Jul; (189):18-9. PubMed ID: 14983866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A policy for the retention and extended examination of organs at autopsy.
Krinsky CS; Lathrop SL; Reichard RR
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Mar; 55(2):418-22. PubMed ID: 20102456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
