124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17078744)
1. Effect of width of disk fenestration and a ventral slot on biomechanics of the canine C5-C6 vertebral motion unit.
Fauber AE; Wade JA; Lipka AE; McCabe GP; Aper RL
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Nov; 67(11):1844-8. PubMed ID: 17078744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a ventral slot procedure and of smooth or positive-profile threaded pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation on intervertebral biomechanics at treated and adjacent canine cervical vertebral motion units.
Koehler CL; Stover SM; LeCouteur RA; Schulz KS; Hawkins DA
Am J Vet Res; 2005 Apr; 66(4):678-87. PubMed ID: 15900950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
Buttermann GR; Beaubien BP; Freeman AL; Stoll JE; Chappuis JL
Spine J; 2009 Jul; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs.
Hicks DG; Pitts MJ; Bagley RS; Vasavada A; Chen AV; Wininger FA; Simon JC
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jun; 70(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19496660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar vertebral column of dogs during lateral bending.
Schulz KS; Waldron DR; Grant JW; Shell L; Smith G; Shires PK
Am J Vet Res; 1996 Aug; 57(8):1228-32. PubMed ID: 8836380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
Scholz M; Reyes PM; Schleicher P; Sawa AG; Baek S; Kandziora F; Marciano FF; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro biomechanical comparison of cervical disk arthroplasty, ventral slot procedure, and smooth pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation at treated and adjacent canine cervical motion units.
Adamo PF; Kobayashi H; Markel M; Vanderby R
Vet Surg; 2007 Dec; 36(8):729-41. PubMed ID: 18067613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biomechanical research on morphometric changes in adjacent inferior cervical intervertebral foramen after artificial disc replacement].
Wang B; Zhang Z; Li K
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1074-9. PubMed ID: 17990773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of disk fenestration on sagittal kinematics of the canine C5-C6 intervertebral space.
Macy NB; Les CM; Stover SM; Kass PH
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 10338162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System after complete laminectomy-facetectomy on the biomechanics of implanted and adjacent segments.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Renner SM; Rosler DM; Ochoa JA; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 18440280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
