1545 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17079378)
21. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in osteonecrosis: a 2- to 10-year evaluation.
Stulberg BN; Singer R; Goldner J; Stulberg J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):116-23. PubMed ID: 9005903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Revision total hip arthroplasty without cement: subsidence of proximally porous-coated femoral components.
Peters CL; Rivero DP; Kull LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1995 Aug; 77(8):1217-26. PubMed ID: 7642668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Complex revision total hip arthroplasty with modular stems at a mean of 14 years.
McCarthy JC; Lee JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():166-9. PubMed ID: 17891035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Poldi-Čech cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty after 25 years].
Rozkydal Z; Janíček P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Aug; 77(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 21059325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High placement of an acetabular component inserted without cement in a revision total hip arthroplasty. Results after a mean of ten years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Apr; 81(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 10225792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Contemporary total hip arthroplasty with and without cement in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a concise follow-up, at an average of seventeen years, of a previous report.
Kim YH; Kim JS; Park JW; Joo JH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Oct; 93(19):1806-10. PubMed ID: 22005866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Outcome of uncemented primary femoral stems for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis.
Hungerford MW; Hungerford DS; Jones LC
Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Apr; 40(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 19358914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Results of a tapered proximally-coated primary cementless stem for revision hip surgery.
Khanuja HS; Issa K; Naziri Q; Banerjee S; Delanois RE; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):225-8. PubMed ID: 23702266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Short-term results of modular extensively porous-coated revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty].
Weng XS; Li JW; Qiu GX; Zhao H; Jin J; Lin J
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2004 Apr; 26(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 15171558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Hip resurfacing for osteonecrosis: two- to 18-year results of the Conserve Plus design and technique.
Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ
Bone Joint J; 2016 Jul; 98-B(7):901-9. PubMed ID: 27365467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia.
Dorr LD; Tawakkol S; Moorthy M; Long W; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 9973058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
