BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17080767)

  • 1. Application of an adaptive design to a randomized phase II selection trial in gastric cancer: a report of the study design.
    Morita S; Sakamoto J
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 17080767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comments on 'Application of an adaptive design to a randomized phase II selection trial in gastric cancer: a report of the study design' by Satoshi Morita and Junichi Sakamoto. Pharmaceutical Statistics.
    Hossain MM; Chen Z
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 22451454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
    Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
    Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.
    Yada S; Hamada C
    Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 27892650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
    Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Bayesian adaptive randomization and multi-stage designs for multi-arm clinical trials.
    Wason JM; Trippa L
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2206-21. PubMed ID: 24421053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SPIRIT: A seamless phase I/II randomized design for immunotherapy trials.
    Guo B; Li D; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):527-540. PubMed ID: 29882388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomarker-based Bayesian randomized phase II clinical trial design to identify a sensitive patient subpopulation.
    Morita S; Yamamoto H; Sugitani Y
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4008-16. PubMed ID: 24820639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Seamlessly expanding a randomized phase II trial to phase III.
    Inoue LY; Thall PF; Berry DA
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 12495136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design issues in randomized phase II/III trials.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B; Abrams JS; Halabi S
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Feb; 30(6):667-71. PubMed ID: 22271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian response-adaptive covariate-balanced randomization design with application to a leukemia clinical trial.
    Yuan Y; Huang X; Liu S
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1218-29. PubMed ID: 21432894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical Bayesian design for randomized Phase II clinical trials with multiple groups.
    Yin J; Qin R; Sargent DJ; Erlichman C; Shi Q
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):451-462. PubMed ID: 28448747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. General keynote: clinical trial design.
    Berry DA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jan; 88(1 Pt 2):S114-6; S122-3. PubMed ID: 12586099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inclusion of real world evidence in clinical development planning.
    Martina R; Jenkins D; Bujkiewicz S; Dequen P; Abrams K;
    Trials; 2018 Aug; 19(1):468. PubMed ID: 30157904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BASIC: A Bayesian adaptive synthetic-control design for phase II clinical trials.
    Jiang L; Thall PF; Yan F; Kopetz S; Yuan Y
    Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 20(5):486-496. PubMed ID: 37313712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials.
    Thall PF; Simon R
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):337-49. PubMed ID: 7980801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal two-stage randomized phase II clinical trials.
    Logan BR
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 16279574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Bayesian adaptive phase II clinical trial design accounting for spatial variation.
    Guo B; Zang Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3187-3204. PubMed ID: 30229695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New designs for the selection of treatments to be tested in randomized clinical trials.
    Simon R; Thall PF; Ellenberg SS
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):417-29. PubMed ID: 8023026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized two-stage design for phase II clinical trials based on a Bayesian predictive approach.
    Cellamare M; Sambucini V
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1059-78. PubMed ID: 25545805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.