These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17080874)

  • 41. SEM evaluation of the hybrid layer after cavity preparation with Er:YAG laser.
    de Barceleiro MO; Dias KR; Sales HX; Silva BC; Barceleiro CG
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 18505220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
    Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Nanoleakage of cervical restorations of four dentin bonding systems.
    Li H; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 11317409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement lining and composite layering technique on the adhesive interface of lateral wall.
    Azevedo LM; Casas-Apayco LC; Villavicencio Espinoza CA; Wang L; Navarro MF; Atta MT
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 26221927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth.
    Reis AF; Giannini M; Kavaguchi A; Soares CJ; Line SR
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 15293420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries-affected dentin.
    Sakoolnamarka R; Burrow MF; Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 12967076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW; Harris EF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Shear bond strength, microleakage, and confocal studies of 4 amalgam alloy bonding agents.
    Grobler SR; Oberholzer TG; Rossouw RJ; Grobler-Rabie A; Van Wyk Kotze TJ
    Quintessence Int; 2000; 31(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 11203971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Marginal adaptation of a new compomer under different conditioning methods.
    Luo Y; Tay FR; Lo EC; Wei SH
    J Dent; 2000 Sep; 28(7):495-500. PubMed ID: 10960753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
    Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The elastic moduli across various types of resin/dentin interfaces.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1102-6. PubMed ID: 18304626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Micromorphological effects and the thickness of the hybrid layer - a comparison of current adhesive systems.
    Skupien JA; Susin AH; Angst PD; Anesi R; Machado P; Bortolotto T; Krejci I
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Dec; 12(6):435-42. PubMed ID: 21246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of Bond Strength, Marginal Integrity, and Fracture Strength of Bulk- vs Incrementally-filled Restorations.
    de Assis FS; Lima SN; Tonetto MR; Bhandi SH; Pinto SC; Malaquias P; Loguercio AD; Bandéca MC
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 27419244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the influence of three different temperatures on microleakage of two self-etch and one total-etch adhesives.
    Akbarian S; Sharafeddin F; Akbarian G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Mar; 16(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 26057914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives.
    Hass V; Dobrovolski M; Zander-Grande C; Martins GC; Gordillo LA; Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L; Gomes OM; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):921-8. PubMed ID: 23830512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.