These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17081526)

  • 1. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
    Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
    Ge YF; Wang CH; Shao Y; Yao B; Wu D; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
    Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Home sperm testing device versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer: comparison of motile sperm concentration.
    Agarwal A; Panner Selvam MK; Sharma R; Master K; Sharma A; Gupta S; Henkel R
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Dec; 110(7):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 30424879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motility assessment of porcine spermatozoa: a comparison of methods.
    Vyt P; Maes D; Rijsselaere T; Dejonckheere E; Castryck F; Van Soom A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2004 Dec; 39(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 15598237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of the sperm quality analyzer (SQA-Vp) for porcine semen analysis.
    Rodríguez AL; Rijsselaere T; Bijttebier J; Vyt P; Van Soom A; Maes D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):972-7. PubMed ID: 21144570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of papanicolaou staining for sperm morphologic analysis: comparison with an automated sperm quality analyzer.
    Singh S; Sharma S; Jain M; Chauhan R
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Aug; 136(2):247-51. PubMed ID: 21757597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs M; De Vliegher S; De Schauwer C; Govaere J; Smits K; Hoflack G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 20965556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility.
    Nallella KP; Sharma RK; Aziz N; Agarwal A
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):629-34. PubMed ID: 16500330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of automated imaging and analysis technology for the detection of aneuploidy in human sperm.
    Carrell DT; Emery BR
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 17936284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of sperm quality analyzer II B: comparison with manual semen analysis and CASA.
    Fuse H; Akashi T; Nozaki T; Nishio R; Mizuno I
    Arch Androl; 2005; 51(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 15764419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrospective study investigating the performance of the SQA-vision analyser compared with manual semen analysis.
    Ilardo C; Defort N; Gala A; Ostengo V; Regnier Vigouroux G; Quere G; Sanguinet P
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2024 Sep; 84(5):373-378. PubMed ID: 39146445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
    Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II-C) for bull semen analysis.
    Hoflack G; Rijsselaere T; Maes D; Dewulf J; Opsomer G; de Kruif A; Van Soom A
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2005 Jun; 40(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15943698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Variability of seminal analysis and of objective parameters of sperm motility in semen during sperm capacitation in subjects with proved fertility].
    Vantman D; Gutiérrez G; Madariaga M; Ponce J; Smith R
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1994; 59(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 7659812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring mouse sperm parameters using a particle counter and sperm quality analyzer: a simple and inexpensive method.
    Tayama K; Fujita H; Takahashi H; Nagasawa A; Yano N; Yuzawa K; Ogata A
    Reprod Toxicol; 2006 Jul; 22(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 16431076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High percentage of abnormal semen parameters in a prevasectomy population.
    Pasqualotto FF; Sobreiro BP; Hallak J; Athayde KS; Pasqualotto EB; Lucon AM
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Apr; 85(4):954-60. PubMed ID: 16580380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.