401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17081820)
41. Food allergies: new labeling guidelines issued by the FDA.
Benedict M
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2006 Aug; 23(8):7. PubMed ID: 16885676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Anticipating new consumer protection challenges in the food and drug marketplace.
Parnes LB
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(2):593-9. PubMed ID: 18561480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The case of the (not-so) 'skinny' treats.
Lewis C
FDA Consum; 2001; 35(4):38-9. PubMed ID: 11692886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. European developments in labelling allergenic foods.
Anandan C; Sheikh A
BMJ; 2005 Nov; 331(7526):1155-6. PubMed ID: 16293813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Analytical testing as a tool for the enforcement of future regulatory thresholds for food allergens.
Diaz-Amigo C; Popping B
J AOAC Int; 2010; 93(2):434-41. PubMed ID: 20480888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Genetic technologies. Bioengineered food--safety and labeling.
Goldman KA
Science; 2000 Oct; 290(5491):457-9. PubMed ID: 11183767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Are you ready for 2004?
Puckett RP
Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2004 Jan; 21(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 14712626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The new European Community rules on the labeling of allergen ingredients in foodstuffs.
Carreno I
Food Drug Law J; 2005; 60(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 16304744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Better European food labelling laws to help people with food intolerances.
MacDonald A
Matern Child Nutr; 2005 Jul; 1(3):223-4. PubMed ID: 16881903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Food labelling and the role of citizens: reading a food label. Note 2].
Marinelli G; Petrella M
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2005; 61(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 17206164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The little agency that could (act with indifference to constitutional and statutory strictures).
Noah L
Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):901-26. PubMed ID: 18618963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Ongoing recall investigation unraveling the facts. Congress holds another hearing, considers legislation relevant to safety of pet food.
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Jun; 230(12):1784-5. PubMed ID: 17605192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Wrap-up of ADA's issues in the 101st Congress.
J Am Diet Assoc; 1990 Dec; 90(12):1653-5. PubMed ID: 2131334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. [Food labelling and the role of consumers. Note n. 1].
Mancinelli G
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2004; 60(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17206235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Genetically modified and other novel food products].
Mannonen L
Duodecim; 2001; 117(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 12092344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Highlights of FDA food safety efforts: fruit juice, mercury in fish.
Formanek R
FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 11444243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Biotechnology and the food label: a legal perspective.
Degnan FH
Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 11824462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. FDA regulatory compliance reconsidered.
Tobias C
Cornell Law Rev; 2008 Jul; 93(5):1003-38. PubMed ID: 18618969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. European Food Labelling Legislation--a nightmare for food manufacturers and allergy sufferers alike.
Warner JO
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15693904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Congress strengthens pet food safety regulations.
Nolen RS
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Nov; 231(9):1320-1. PubMed ID: 17975986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
