95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17082330)
1. Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000.
Lagravère MO; Fang Y; Carey J; Toogood RW; Packota GV; Major PW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Nov; 35(6):407-9. PubMed ID: 17082330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Ben-Zvi M; Packota GV; Major PW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Sep; 37(6):305-8. PubMed ID: 18757714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic advantages and possibilities for secondary reconstruction of NewTom 9000 data sets using eFilm.
Schulze D; Heiland M
Int J Comput Dent; 2004 Jan; 7(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 15317308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom).
Lascala CA; Panella J; Marques MM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):291-4. PubMed ID: 15585804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate.
Wörtche R; Hassfeld S; Lux CJ; Müssig E; Hensley FW; Krempien R; Hofele C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):88-94. PubMed ID: 16549435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.
Hohlweg-Majert B; Metzger MC; Kummer T; Schulze D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 21030266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation between pixel values in a cone-beam computed tomographic scanner and the computed tomographic values in a multidetector row computed tomographic scanner.
Chindasombatjaroen J; Kakimoto N; Shimamoto H; Murakami S; Furukawa S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):662-5. PubMed ID: 21926866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)].
Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C
Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Bazalova M; Carrier JF; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2439-56. PubMed ID: 18421124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospects and challenges of rendering tissue density in Hounsfield units for cone beam computed tomography.
Molteni R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jul; 116(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 23768878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications.
Loubele M; Maes F; Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D; White SC; Suetens P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18583372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging.
Mischkowski RA; Pulsfort R; Ritter L; Neugebauer J; Brochhagen HG; Keeve E; Zöller JE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 17613260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of MDCT and CBCT in three-dimensional evaluation of the oropharynx morphology.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Aarab G; Forouzanfar T; de Lange J; van der Stelt P; Lobbezoo F; Wolff J
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 40(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 28453722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.
Mah P; Reeves TE; McDavid WD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):323-35. PubMed ID: 20729181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-assisted implant placement. Part I: relationship of radiographic gray density and implant stability.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Avsever H; Özdemir T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Dec; 15(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 22251553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.
Sande EP; Martinsen AC; Hole EO; Olerud HM
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):5123-35. PubMed ID: 20714048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and accuracy of three imaging software packages used for 3D analysis of the upper airway on cone beam computed tomography images.
Chen H; van Eijnatten M; Wolff J; de Lange J; van der Stelt PF; Lobbezoo F; Aarab G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170043. PubMed ID: 28467118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed gray levels in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography.
Azeredo F; de Menezes LM; Enciso R; Weissheimer A; de Oliveira RB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 23810056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Beam hardening artefacts occur in dental implant scans with the NewTom cone beam CT but not with the dental 4-row multidetector CT.
Draenert FG; Coppenrath E; Herzog P; Müller S; Mueller-Lisse UG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 17536086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
