55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17082703)
1. Inherently 3-dimensional method for measurement of computed tomographic resolution anisotropy.
Jones SE; Grasruck M; Schmidt B; Madisch I; Egeland R; Brady T; Gupta R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(6):962-71. PubMed ID: 17082703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flat panel detector-based volumetric computed tomography (fpVCT): performance evaluation of volumetric methods by using different phantoms in comparison to 64-multislice computed tomography.
Obenauer S; Dullin C; Heuser M
Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 17414524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the improved three-dimensional resolution of a synchrotron radiation computed tomograph using a micro-fabricated test pattern.
Mizutani R; Takeuchi A; Uesugi K; Suzuki Y
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2008 Nov; 15(Pt 6):648-54. PubMed ID: 18955773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isotropic proton-density-weighted high-resolution MRI for volume measurement of reconstructed orbital fractures--a comparison with multislice CT.
Kolk A; Pautke C; Wiener E; Schott V; Wolff KD; Horch HH; Rummeny EJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 26(8):1167-74. PubMed ID: 18524524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes.
Kemp BJ; Kim C; Williams JJ; Ganin A; Lowe VJ;
J Nucl Med; 2006 Dec; 47(12):1960-7. PubMed ID: 17138738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of oblique X-ray incidence in flat-panel computed tomography of the breast.
Badano A; Kyprianou IS; Freed M; Jennings RJ; Sempau J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 May; 28(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 19272986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A quality assurance phantom for the performance evaluation of volumetric micro-CT systems.
Du LY; Umoh J; Nikolov HN; Pollmann SI; Lee TY; Holdsworth DW
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):7087-108. PubMed ID: 18029995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.
Stützel J; Oelfke U; Nill S
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 18031854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital tomosynthesis aided by low-resolution exact computed tomography.
Zeng K; Yu H; Zhao S; Fajardo LL; Ruth C; Jing Z; Wang G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(6):976-83. PubMed ID: 18043366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new high-resolution computed tomography (CT) segmentation method for trabecular bone architectural analysis.
Scherf H; Tilgner R
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Sep; 140(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 19280676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D CT imaging in clinical practice.
Meyers MA
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 18682879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increase of accuracy in intraoperative navigation through high-resolution flat-panel volume computed tomography: experimental comparison with multislice computed tomography-based navigation.
Bartling SH; Leinung M; Graute J; Rodt T; Dullin C; Becker H; Lenarz T; Stover T; Majdani O
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 17195752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interactively variable isotropic resolution in computed tomography.
Lapp RM; Kyriakou Y; Kachelriess M; Wilharm S; Kalender WA
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(10):2693-713. PubMed ID: 18445875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advanced postprocessing and the emerging role of computer-aided detection.
Singh AK; Hiroyuki Y; Sahani DV
Radiol Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 47(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 19195534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating perfusion using microCT to locate microspheres.
Marxen M; Paget C; Yu LX; Henkelman RM
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):N9-16. PubMed ID: 16357426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement of spatial resolution in the longitudinal direction for isotropic imaging in helical CT.
Tsukagoshi S; Ota T; Fujii M; Kazama M; Okumura M; Johkoh T
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):791-801. PubMed ID: 17228121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Verification of a method to detect glass microspheres via micro-CT.
Crookston NR; Pasciak AS; Abiola G; Donahue D; Weiss CR; Frey EC
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5623-5636. PubMed ID: 31621918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Musculoskeletal applications of flat-panel volume CT.
Reichardt B; Sarwar A; Bartling SH; Cheung A; Grasruck M; Leidecker C; Bredella MA; Brady TJ; Gupta R
Skeletal Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1069-76. PubMed ID: 18443787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography.
Baxter BS; Sorenson JA
Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 7275548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]