These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17083117)
1. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Cam C; Sakalli M; Ay P; Cam M; Karateke A Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 17083117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires--short forms. El-Azab AS; Mascha EJ Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18671300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in a Turkish population. Cam C; Sancak P; Karahan N; Sancak A; Celik C; Karateke A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Sep; 146(1):104-7. PubMed ID: 19573977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validity of the incontinence severity index. Murphy M; Culligan PJ; Arce CM; Graham CA; Blackwell L; Heit MH Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16652379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited. van der Vaart CH; de Leeuw JR; Roovers JP; Heintz AP Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12579625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis. Harvey MA; Kristjansson B; Griffith D; Versi E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11483899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch population. Utomo E; Korfage IJ; Wildhagen MF; Steensma AB; Bangma CH; Blok BF Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Jan; 34(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24167010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term patient satisfaction following cadaveric pubovaginal sling incontinence surgery using the UDI and IIQ-7 questionnaires. Pianezza ML; Joffe R; Chugh T; Radomski SB Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 16998860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the urogenital distress inventory and the incontinence impact questionnaire. Hagen S; Hanley J; Capewell A Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 12382243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of the Polish version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form. Skorupska KA; Miotla P; Kubik-Komar A; Skorupski P; Rechberger T Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():171-174. PubMed ID: 28633095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient reported outcomes tools in an observational study of female stress urinary incontinence. van de Vaart H; Falconer C; Quail D; Timlin L; Manning M; Tincello D; Tunn R Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Mar; 29(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 19283868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Validation of the Spanish version of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in pregnant women]. Ruiz de Viñaspre Hernández R; Tomás Aznar C; Rubio Aranda E Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 21871693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there an alternative to pad tests? Correlation of subjective variables of severity of urinary loss to the 1-h pad test in women with stress urinary incontinence. Franco AV; Lee F; Fynes MM BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 18384632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Turkish population. Cam C; Sakalli M; Ay P; Aran T; Cam M; Karateke A Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Nov; 135(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 17693011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Barber MD; Kuchibhatla MN; Pieper CF; Bump RC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1388-95. PubMed ID: 11744914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Barber MD; Walters MD; Bump RC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 16021067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Responsiveness of urogynecologic quality of life measurements to change after radical gynecologic surgery. Cam C; Celik C; Yildirim G; Tug N; Cam M; Karateke A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Nov; 284(5):1259-63. PubMed ID: 21188400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Swedish version of the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Franzén K; Johansson JE; Karlsson J; Nilsson K Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 May; 92(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 22686542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Italian validation of the urogenital distress inventory and its application in LUTS patients. Artibani W; Pesce F; Prezioso D; Scarpa RM; Zattoni F; Tubaro A; Rizzi CA; Santini AM; Simoni L; Eur Urol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):1323-9. PubMed ID: 16713067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation survey of the impact of urinary incontinence (IIQ-7) and inventory of distress urogenital (UDI-6) - the short scales - in patients with multiple sclerosis. Stievano LP; Olival GS; Silva RA; Toller VB; Carabetta EG; da Cunha ET; Moreira Rde J; Eloi M; Tilbery CP Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2015 Jan; 73(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 25608127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]