172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17083187)
1. Abram v. Children's Hospital of Buffalo.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Wests N Y Suppl; 1989; 542():418-9. PubMed ID: 17083187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randolph v. City of New York.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division
N Y Suppl Second Ser; 1986; 501():837-46. PubMed ID: 17086649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Haughian v. Paine.
Canada. Saskatchewan. Court of Appeal
Dom Law Rep; 1987 Apr; 37():624-49. PubMed ID: 12041073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dwight B. v. Board of Education.
New York. Supreme Court, Orange County
Wests N Y Suppl; 1993; 600():414-6. PubMed ID: 17078151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Doe v. Roe.
New York. Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Wests N Y Suppl; 1993; 599():350-8. PubMed ID: 17078152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Association.
Connecticut. Supreme Court
Atl Report; 1983 Sep; 465():294-308. PubMed ID: 11648514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent and the disclosure of risks of treatment: the Supreme Court of Canada decides.
Dillon JR
Bioethics Q; 1981; 3(3-4):156-62. PubMed ID: 11649479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Halley v. Birbiglia.
Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Worcester
Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Dec; 390():540-50. PubMed ID: 12041108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Butler v. Brown.
Georgia. Court of Appeals
South East Report Second Ser; 1982 Apr; 290():293-5. PubMed ID: 12041310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cheung v. Cunningham.
New Jersey. Superior Court, Appellate Division
Atl Report; 1987 Jan; 520():832-7. PubMed ID: 11648565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Proof of causation in informed consent cases: establishing what the plaintiff would have done.
Cockburn T; Madden B
J Law Med; 2010 Dec; 18(2):320-32. PubMed ID: 21355434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent and hospital's liability for honorary surgeon: an Australian decision.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1990 Apr; 335(8696):1027-8. PubMed ID: 1970074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estate of Leach v. Shapiro.
Ohio. Court of Appeals, Summit County
North East Rep Second Ser; 1984 May; 469():1047-55. PubMed ID: 12041215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Think of the Children: Liability for Non-Disclosure of Information Post-Montgomery.
Cave E; Purshouse C
Med Law Rev; 2020 May; 28(2):270-292. PubMed ID: 31504791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Doe v. Roe.
Wisconsin. Court of Appeals
Wests North West Rep; 1989 Jun; 444():437-43. PubMed ID: 12041133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Davis v. United States.
U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, N.D
Fed Suppl; 1986 Feb; 629():1-8. PubMed ID: 11648541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: a Canadian case in a British perspective.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1987 Oct; 2(8566):1038. PubMed ID: 2889956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dries v. Gregor: a case study of informed consent doctrine in New York.
Schreiber JA
N Y State Bar J; 1981 Oct; 53(6):431-7. PubMed ID: 16044597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Faya v. Almaraz.
Maryland. Court of Appeals
Atl Report; 1993 Mar; 620():327-39. PubMed ID: 11648611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anderson v. Strong Memorial Hospital.
New York. Supreme Court, Monroe County
Wests N Y Suppl; 1991; 573():828-33. PubMed ID: 17083192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
