601 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17084506)
1. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Radical perineal prostatectomy--surgical technique, first results].
Mshvildadze ShT; Udzhmadzhuridze AN; Managadze GL; Shtakl' V
Georgian Med News; 2007 Feb; (143):58-63. PubMed ID: 17404442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
Carini M; Masieri L; Minervini A; Lapini A; Serni S
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 17683854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.
Harris MJ
Eur Urol; 2003 Sep; 44(3):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 12932927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
Janoff DM; Parra RO
J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach.
Harris MJ; Thompson IM
Urology; 1996 Nov; 48(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8911522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Introducing a new, simple scoring system to evaluate oncological and functional outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis A; Saint F; De La Taille A; Chopin D; Abbou CC
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2003; 37(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 14594687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perineal salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer.
van der Poel HG; Beetsma DB; van Boven H; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1565-71; discussion 1572. PubMed ID: 16949728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial comment on: Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer.
van der Poel HG
Eur Urol; 2008 Mar; 53(3):561-2. PubMed ID: 17683855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Montorsi F; Salonia A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zanni G; Briganti A; Deho' F; Naspro R; Farina E; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):938-45. PubMed ID: 16257111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early patient self-assessed outcomes of nerve-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy.
Wiygul JB; Harris MJ; Dahm P
Urology; 2005 Sep; 66(3):582-6. PubMed ID: 16140082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical analysis of radical retropubic prostatectomy: a report of 132 cases].
Huang YR; Wang YT; Xue W; Liu DM; Zhou LX
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 44(6):365-8. PubMed ID: 16638341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases.
Mottrie A; Van Migem P; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Carpentier P; Fonteyne E
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):746-50. PubMed ID: 17329020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
