These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17084761)

  • 1. Priority setting for health interventions in Mexico's System of Social Protection in Health.
    González-Pier E; Gutiérrez-Delgado C; Stevens G; Barraza-Lloréns M; Porras-Condey R; Carvalho N; Loncich K; Dias RH; Kulkarni S; Casey A; Murakami Y; Ezzati M; Salomon JA
    Lancet; 2006 Nov; 368(9547):1608-18. PubMed ID: 17084761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Priority setting for health interventions in Mexico's System of Social Protection in Health].
    González-Pier E; Gutiérrez-Delgado C; Stevens G; Barraza-Lloréns M; Porras-Condey R; Carvalho N; Loncich K; Dias RH; Kulkarni S; Casey A; Murakami Y; Ezzati M; Salomon JA
    Salud Publica Mex; 2007; 49 Suppl 1():S37-52. PubMed ID: 17469398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Gateway Paper--financing health in Pakistan and its linkage with health reforms.
    Nishtar S
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12 Suppl 4):S25-42. PubMed ID: 17595831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework.
    Peacock SJ; Mitton C; Ruta D; Donaldson C; Bate A; Hedden L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 20950070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.
    Shaller D
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 2):217-27. PubMed ID: 14702504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual and reproductive health: challenges for priority-setting in Ghana's health reforms.
    Mayhew SH; Adjei S
    Health Policy Plan; 2004 Oct; 19 Suppl 1():i50-i61. PubMed ID: 15452015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico.
    Frenk J
    Lancet; 2006 Sep; 368(9539):954-61. PubMed ID: 16962886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
    Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Priority setting and implementation in a centralized health system: a case study of Kerman province in Iran.
    Khayatzadeh-Mahani A; Fotaki M; Harvey G
    Health Policy Plan; 2013 Aug; 28(5):480-94. PubMed ID: 23002248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico.
    Frenk J; González-Pier E; Gómez-Dantés O; Lezana MA; Knaul FM
    Lancet; 2006 Oct; 368(9546):1524-34. PubMed ID: 17071286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Executive summary.
    Martin S; Bouchard F; Butler-Jones D; Keddy M; Metcalfe R; Sommer S; Hampton MJ
    Can J Public Health; 1996; 87(1):I1-I56. PubMed ID: 8991735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Priority setting in the Austrian healthcare system: results from a discrete choice experiment and implications for mental health.
    Mentzakis E; Paolucci F; Rubicko G
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2014 Jun; 17(2):61-73. PubMed ID: 25153094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new proposal for priority setting in Norway: Open and fair.
    Ottersen T; Førde R; Kakad M; Kjellevold A; Melberg HO; Moen A; Ringard Å; Norheim OF
    Health Policy; 2016 Mar; 120(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 26851991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Netherlands: health system review.
    Schäfer W; Kroneman M; Boerma W; van den Berg M; Westert G; Devillé W; van Ginneken E
    Health Syst Transit; 2010; 12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228. PubMed ID: 21132996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An innovative approach to public health research: the case of a new center in Mexico.
    Frenk J; Bobadilla JL; Sepúlveda J; Rosenthal J; Ruelas E; González-Block MA; Urrusti J
    J Health Adm Educ; 1986; 4(3):467-81. PubMed ID: 10278635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priority setting in practice: what is the best way to compare costs and benefits?
    Wilson EC; Peacock SJ; Ruta D
    Health Econ; 2009 Apr; 18(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 18561215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient and provider perspectives on quality and health system effectiveness in a transition economy: evidence from Ukraine.
    Luck J; Peabody JW; DeMaria LM; Alvarado CS; Menon R
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Aug; 114():57-65. PubMed ID: 24911509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health sector reform: priorities and packages.
    Infante A
    World Health Forum; 1997; 18(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 9393001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Gateway Paper--context and configuration of the proposed health reforms in Pakistan.
    Nishtar S
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2006 Dec; 56(12 Suppl 4):S2-13. PubMed ID: 17595829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.