276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17085745)
1. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pepe MS; Janes H
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian latent class models with conditionally dependent diagnostic tests: a case study.
Menten J; Boelaert M; Lesaffre E
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4469-88. PubMed ID: 18551515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Formann AK; Böhning D
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):777-8. PubMed ID: 18718923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy.
Yang I; Becker MP
Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):948-58. PubMed ID: 9290225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application.
Sepúlveda R; Vicente-Villardón JL; Galindo MP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1855-69. PubMed ID: 18265437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using pseudogold standards and latent-class analysis in combination to evaluate the accuracy of three diagnostic tests.
Nérette P; Stryhn H; Dohoo I; Hammell L
Prev Vet Med; 2008 Jul; 85(3-4):207-25. PubMed ID: 18355935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods for evaluating the performance of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard: a latent class model approach.
Garrett ES; Eaton WW; Zeger S
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1289-307. PubMed ID: 12111879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some issues in resolution of diagnostic tests using an imperfect gold standard.
Hawkins DM; Garrett JA; Stephenson B
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1987-2001. PubMed ID: 11427955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of weighted kappa coefficients of multiple binary diagnostic tests done on the same subjects.
Roldán Nofuentes JA; Luna del Castillo JD
Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2149-65. PubMed ID: 20809538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of imperfect diagnostic tests had an impact on prevalence estimation.
Ihorst G; Forster J; Petersen G; Werchau H; Rohwedder A; Schumacher M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 60(9):902-10. PubMed ID: 17689806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model.
Dendukuri N; Hadgu A; Wang L
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):441-61. PubMed ID: 19067379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L; Franco EL
Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(17):2527-46. PubMed ID: 12205697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
Spencer BD
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
