These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17086076)

  • 21. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking.
    Cohen LT; Richardson LM; Saunders E; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2003 May; 179(1-2):72-87. PubMed ID: 12742240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neural mechanisms of tone-on-tone masking: patterns of discharge rate and discharge synchrony related to rates of spontaneous discharge in the chinchilla auditory nerve.
    Sinex DG; Havey DC
    J Neurophysiol; 1986 Dec; 56(6):1763-80. PubMed ID: 3806187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
    Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
    Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of masker component phase on the forward masking produced by complex tones in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Stainsby TH; Tarasewicz E
    Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 192(1-2):90-100. PubMed ID: 15157967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurements of monopolar and bipolar current spreads using forward-masking with a fixed probe.
    Bingabr MG; Espinoza-Varas B; Sigdel S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 May; 15(3):166-72. PubMed ID: 24606491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears].
    Picard M; Couture-Metz F
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.
    Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jun; 109(6):2921-33. PubMed ID: 11425134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea.
    Lim HH; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Sep; 86(3):971-80. PubMed ID: 2794250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Abbas PJ; Hughes ML; Brown CJ; Miller CA; South H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2004; 9(4):203-13. PubMed ID: 15205548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays.
    Cohen LT; Saunders E; Knight MR; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):160-75. PubMed ID: 16403611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.
    Adel Y; Hilkhuysen G; Noreña A; Cazals Y; Roman S; Macherey O
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Jun; 18(3):495-512. PubMed ID: 28224320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of peri-modiolar cochlear implant positioning on auditory nerve responses: a neural response telemetry study.
    van Weert S; Stokroos RJ; Rikers MM; van Dijk P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):725-31. PubMed ID: 16012034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Stille LJ
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):435-52. PubMed ID: 18344869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB; Downing M; Osberger MJ; Litvak L
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An improved masker-probe method for stimulus artifact reduction in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Alvarez I; de la Torre A; Sainz M; Roldan C; Schoesser H; Spitzer P
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Oct; 175(1):143-7. PubMed ID: 18771694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.