These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17086076)

  • 41. Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.
    Delgutte B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Feb; 87(2):791-809. PubMed ID: 2307776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The effect of stimulus level on excitation patterns of individual electrode contacts in cochlear implants.
    Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Kalkman RK; Frijns JHM
    Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108490. PubMed ID: 35395510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Forward- and simultaneous-masked thresholds in bandlimited maskers in subjects with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1049-57. PubMed ID: 11519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.
    Eisen MD; Franck KH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 6(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 15952052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.
    Zhou N
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0165476. PubMed ID: 27798658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses.
    Harris DM; Dallos P
    J Neurophysiol; 1979 Jul; 42(4):1083-1107. PubMed ID: 479921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Spread of excitation varies for different electrical pulse shapes and stimulation modes in cochlear implants.
    Undurraga JA; Carlyon RP; Macherey O; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):21-36. PubMed ID: 22583921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.
    Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1117. PubMed ID: 29495705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Temporal integration in the gerbil: the effects of age, hearing loss and temporally unmodulated and modulated speech-like masker noises.
    Gleich O; Kittel MC; Klump GM; Strutz J
    Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 224(1-2):101-14. PubMed ID: 17223296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Masking of rippled-spectrum-pattern resolution in diotic and dichotic presentations.
    Supin AY; Popov VV; Milekhina ON; Tarakanov MB
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):109-16. PubMed ID: 20005938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.
    Chatterjee M; Oba SI
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Dec; 5(4):360-75. PubMed ID: 15675001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Frequency selectivity in patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Papsin BC; Abel SM; Nedzelski JM
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1092-8. PubMed ID: 8072355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Electrode independence in intraneural cochlear nerve stimulation.
    Badi AN; Owa AO; Shelton C; Normann RA
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Jan; 28(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 17195741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 5. refractory recovery and facilitation.
    Cohen LT
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 19110048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychophysical estimates of level-dependent best-frequency shifts in the apical region of the human basilar membrane.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Barrios LF; Alves-Pinto A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3646-54. PubMed ID: 17552716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Spatial and temporal effects of interleaved masking in cochlear implants.
    Kwon BJ; van den Honert C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 10(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 19495879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A Novel Algorithm to Derive Spread of Excitation Based on Deconvolution.
    Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):572-81. PubMed ID: 27015548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.