2661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17086077)
1. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of talker variability on vowel recognition in cochlear implants.
Chang YP; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Dec; 49(6):1331-41. PubMed ID: 17197499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
Harkrider AW; Plyler PN; Hedrick MS
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory/visual speech perception by cochlear implant users and hearing aid wearers.
Danhauer JL; Erratt JD; Edgerton BJ
Am J Otol; 1986 Sep; 7(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 3789122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consonant identification in consonant-vowel-consonant syllables in speech-spectrum noise.
Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ; Ua Cruadhlaoich MA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1609-23. PubMed ID: 20329860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech recognition with the advanced combination encoder and transient emphasis spectral maxima strategies in nucleus 24 recipients.
Holden LK; Vandali AE; Skinner MW; Fourakis MS; Holden TA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):681-701. PubMed ID: 16197281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consonant perception by users of Nucleus and Clarion multichannel cochlear implants.
Doyle KJ; Mills D; Larky J; Kessler D; Luxford WM; Schindler RA
Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):676-81. PubMed ID: 8588676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor.
Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
Korczak PA; Stapells DR
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech identification in noise: Contribution of temporal, spectral, and visual speech cues.
Kim J; Davis C; Groot C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3246-57. PubMed ID: 20000938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
Boyd PJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Slattery WH
Am J Otol; 1999 Nov; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory Perception and Production of Speech Feature Contrasts by Pediatric Implant Users.
Mahshie J; Core C; Larsen MD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):653-63. PubMed ID: 26035142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
