These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation. Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience. Gordon KA; Tanaka S; Wong DD; Papsin BC Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants. Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms. Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system. Plant K; Holden L; Skinner M; Arcaroli J; Whitford L; Law MA; Nel E Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):381-93. PubMed ID: 17485987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation. Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing. Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Long-latency evoked acoustic potentials in patients with cochlear implants compared with normally hearing subjects]. Danilkina GV; Wolberet T; Vishniakov VV; Hoppe U Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2009; (3):16-8. PubMed ID: 19692958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]