These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17086337)
41. Interprofessional teamwork in comprehensive primary healthcare services: Findings from a mixed methods study. Bentley M; Freeman T; Baum F; Javanparast S J Interprof Care; 2018 May; 32(3):274-283. PubMed ID: 29182411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Public health research personnel and health and prevention program personnel: an impossible marriage? The example of research in adolescent health]. Michaud PA Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2000 Oct; 120(10):821-6. PubMed ID: 11109913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Assessing the relationship between quality of care and the characteristics of health care organizations. Dudley RA; Landon BE; Rubin HR; Keating NL; Medlin CA; Luft HS Med Care Res Rev; 2000; 57 Suppl 2():116-35. PubMed ID: 11105509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Fostering knowledge exchange between researchers and decision-makers: exploring the effectiveness of a mixed-methods approach. Gagliardi AR; Fraser N; Wright FC; Lemieux-Charles L; Davis D Health Policy; 2008 Apr; 86(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 17935826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Reflections on knowledge brokering within a multidisciplinary research team. Urquhart R; Porter GA; Grunfeld E J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2011; 31(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 22189993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Yu CH; Ivers NM; Stacey D; Rezmovitz J; Telner D; Thorpe K; Hall S; Settino M; Kaplan DM; Coons M; Sodhi S; Sale J; Straus SE Trials; 2015 Jun; 16():286. PubMed ID: 26116444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Transcending differences to study the transcendent: an exploratory study of researchers' and chaplains' reflections on interdisciplinary spiritual care research collaboration. Powell RA; Emanuel L; Handzo G; Lantos J; Dunn LB; Idler EL; Wilkie DJ; Massey K; Summerfelt WT; Barnes MJ; Quest TE; Kestenbaum A; Steinhauser K; Fitchett G; Zollfrank A; Olsen AK; Balboni TA; Sommer D BMC Palliat Care; 2015 Apr; 14():12. PubMed ID: 25927207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Preventing harm and promoting ethical discourse in the helping professions: conceptual, research, analytical, and action frameworks. Prilleltensky I; Rossiter A; Walsh-Bowers R Ethics Behav; 1996; 6(4):287-306. PubMed ID: 11656595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Qualitative teamwork issues and strategies: coordination through mutual adjustment. Hall WA; Long B; Bermbach N; Jordan S; Patterson K Qual Health Res; 2005 Mar; 15(3):394-410. PubMed ID: 15761107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Interdisciplinary communication and collaboration among physicians, nurses, and unlicensed assistive personnel. Lancaster G; Kolakowsky-Hayner S; Kovacich J; Greer-Williams N J Nurs Scholarsh; 2015 May; 47(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 25801466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Review: Toward realizing the potential of diversity in composition of interprofessional health care teams: an examination of the cognitive and psychosocial dynamics of interprofessional collaboration. Mitchell R; Parker V; Giles M; White N Med Care Res Rev; 2010 Feb; 67(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 19605620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Great expectations: An analysis of researchers' and policy makers' perceptions of the potential value of the Australian indigenous burden of disease study for policy. Katz A; Gajjar D; Zwi AB; Hill PS Int J Health Plann Manage; 2018 Jan; 33(1):e181-e193. PubMed ID: 28758235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. 'Dipping our toes in the research pool': novice researchers in a collaborative project. Douglas J; Flood Y; Morris S; Rushton C Nurse Res; 2008; 15(3):59-71. PubMed ID: 18459487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Collaborative research teams: It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. Duff D Can J Neurosci Nurs; 2015; 37(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 26647492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Understanding interprofessional collaboration in the context of chronic disease management for older adults living in communities: a concept analysis. Bookey-Bassett S; Markle-Reid M; Mckey CA; Akhtar-Danesh N J Adv Nurs; 2017 Jan; 73(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 27681818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. To Give and To Get: How Nurse Faculty Scholars Contribute and Benefit From Participating in Interdisciplinary Research Teams. Solis GR Nurs Forum; 2017 Apr; 52(2):133-137. PubMed ID: 27943316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Design and management of disciplinary and interdisciplinary groups in health services: review and critique. Kaluzny AD Med Care Rev; 1985; 42(1):77-112. PubMed ID: 10300189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Exploring the importance of team psychological safety in the development of two interprofessional teams. O'Leary DF J Interprof Care; 2016; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 26833105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Methodological aspects of the reconstitution and evaluation of the behavioral theories that underlie population policy]. Leeuw F Politiq Popul; 1991 Sep; 4(4):5-42. PubMed ID: 12285025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Linking researchers and policy-makers: some challenges and approaches. Gordon-Strachan G; Bailey W; Lalta S; Ward E; Henry-Lee A; LeFranc E Cad Saude Publica; 2006; 22 Suppl():S69-76. PubMed ID: 17086339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]