186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17087593)
1. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
Hannah SD; Brooks LR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of stimulus properties on category construction.
Milton F; Wills AJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):407-15. PubMed ID: 14979814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrimination of artificial categories structured by family resemblances: a comparative study in people (Homo sapiens) and pigeons (Columba livia).
Makino H; Jitsumori M
J Comp Psychol; 2007 Feb; 121(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 17324072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exemplar effects in the context of a categorization rule: Featural and holistic influences.
Thibaut JP; Gelaes S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1403-15. PubMed ID: 17087592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How causal knowledge affects classification: A generative theory of categorization.
Rehder B; Kim S
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):659-83. PubMed ID: 16822139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceive-decide-act, perceive-decide-act: how abstract is repetition-related decision learning?
Denkinger B; Koutstaal W
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):742-56. PubMed ID: 19379047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Category-based predictions: influence of uncertainty and feature associations.
Ross BH; Murphy GL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 May; 22(3):736-53. PubMed ID: 8656154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for an age-independent process in category learning.
Livingston KR; Andrews JK
Dev Sci; 2005 Jul; 8(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 15985065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of familiar features on diagnosis: instantiated features in an applied setting.
Dore KL; Brooks LR; Weaver B; Norman GR
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Mar; 18(1):109-25. PubMed ID: 22428557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Instantiated features and the use of "rules.".
Brooks LR; Hannah SD
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):133-51. PubMed ID: 16719647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction.
Vonk J; MacDonald SE
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Nov; 78(3):315-32. PubMed ID: 12507006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discontinuous categories affect information-integration but not rule-based category learning.
Maddox WT; Filoteo JV; Lauritzen JS; Connally E; Hejl KD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):654-69. PubMed ID: 16060771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of perceptual features in categorization by orangutans (Pongo abelli).
Marsh HL; MacDonald SE
Anim Cogn; 2008 Oct; 11(4):569-85. PubMed ID: 18415129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Event-related potentials reveal the relations between feature representations at different levels of abstraction.
Hannah SD; Shedden JM; Brooks LR; Grundy JG
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2166-88. PubMed ID: 26513169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults.
Minda JP; Desroches AS; Church BA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1518-33. PubMed ID: 18980411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tests of the ratio rule in categorization.
Wills AJ; Reimers S; Stewart N; Suret M; McLaren IP
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):983-1011. PubMed ID: 11131824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychophysics of contingency assessment.
Allan LG; Hannah SD; Crump MJ; Siegel S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 May; 137(2):226-43. PubMed ID: 18473655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
