These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Sensitivity of the solution of the Elder problem to density, velocity and numerical perturbations. Park CH; Aral MM J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Jun; 92(1-2):33-49. PubMed ID: 17222477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A hybrid artificial neural network-numerical model for ground water problems. Szidarovszky F; Coppola EA; Long J; Hall AD; Poulton MM Ground Water; 2007; 45(5):590-600. PubMed ID: 17760585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scale effects of hydrostratigraphy and recharge zonation on base flow. Juckem PF; Hunt RJ; Anderson MP Ground Water; 2006; 44(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 16681517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modelling the migration of contaminants through variably saturated dual-porosity, dual-permeability chalk. Brouyère S J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(3-4):195-219. PubMed ID: 16303208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of a mesoscale infiltration and water seepage test in unsaturated fractured rock: Spatial variabilities and discrete fracture patterns. Zhou Q; Salve R; Liu HH; Wang JS; Hudson D J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):96-122. PubMed ID: 16797103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling axisymmetric flow and transport. Langevin CD Ground Water; 2008; 46(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 18384599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of solute transport across low-permeability barrier walls. Harte PT; Konikow LF; Hornberger GZ J Contam Hydrol; 2006 May; 85(3-4):247-70. PubMed ID: 16600421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model. Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of subsidence data in ground water model calibration. Yan T; Burbey TJ Ground Water; 2008; 46(4):538-50. PubMed ID: 18384595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The turning factor in the estimation of stream-aquifer seepage. Morel-Seytoux HJ Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 19016894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parameter estimation/sensitivity analysis for an aquifer test with skin effect. Chen YJ; Yeh HD Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 19210564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An assembly model for simulation of large-scale ground water flow and transport. Huang J; Christ JA; Goltz MN Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 18715260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW. Mehl S; Hill MC; Leake SA Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):792-6. PubMed ID: 17087750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Lowry CS; Anderson MP Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 16961487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of injection conditions on field tracer experiments. Brouyère S; Carabin G; Dassargues A Ground Water; 2005; 43(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 15882330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PRO-GRADE: GIS toolkits for ground water recharge and discharge estimation. Lin YF; Wang J; Valocchi AJ Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 18823400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]