1025 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17088203)
21. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of uncovertebral joint excision on the motion response of the cervical spine after total disc replacement.
Snyder JT; Tzermiadianos MN; Ghanayem AJ; Voronov LI; Rinella A; Dooris A; Carandang G; Renner SM; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):2965-9. PubMed ID: 18091488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a locked plate and wedged graft effectively stabilizes flexion-distraction stage-3 injury in the lower cervical spine: a biomechanical study.
Paxinos O; Ghanayem AJ; Zindrick MR; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Hadjipavlou A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19127153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device.
Xu HZ; Wang XY; Chi YL; Zhu QA; Lin Y; Huang QS; Dai LY
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 16434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson M; Lehman RA; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Dec; 33(26):2868-73. PubMed ID: 19092616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.
Tsai KJ; Murakami H; Lowery GL; Hutton WC
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 17087886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].
Zhang J; Lu WW; Ye QB; Qiu GX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2005 Apr; 27(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 15960256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of facetectomy and crosslink augmentation on motion segment flexibility in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Chutkan NB; Zhou H; Akins JP; Wenger KH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E828-35. PubMed ID: 18923306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker.
Shim CS; Park SW; Lee SH; Lim TJ; Chun K; Kim DH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):E820-7. PubMed ID: 18923305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD
Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Ploumis A; Wu C; Fischer G; Mehbod AA; Wu W; Faundez A; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Multi-segment ventral stabilization of the lumbar spine: a comparative biomechanical study].
Eysel P; Hopf C; Diop A; Lavaste F
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1995; 133(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7610706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
