241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17089857)
21. Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1455-65. PubMed ID: 11488579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization.
Sahiner B; Petrick N; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Paramagul C; Helvie MA; Gurcan MN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1275-84. PubMed ID: 11811827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Digital mammography: comparison of adaptive and nonadaptive CAD methods for mass detection.
Qian W; Li L; Clarke L; Clark RA; Thomas J
Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):471-80. PubMed ID: 10480043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Significance of MPEG-7 textural features for improved mass detection in mammography.
Eltonsy NH; Tourassi GD; Fadeev A; Elmaghraby AS
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4779-82. PubMed ID: 17946650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Study of the effect of breast tissue density on detection of masses in mammograms.
García-Manso A; García-Orellana CJ; González-Velasco HM; Gallardo-Caballero R; Macías-Macías M
Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():213794. PubMed ID: 23573165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of computer-aided diagnosis on a large clinical full-field digital mammographic dataset.
Li H; Giger ML; Yuan Y; Chen W; Horsch K; Lan L; Jamieson AR; Sennett CA; Jansen SA
Acad Radiol; 2008 Nov; 15(11):1437-45. PubMed ID: 18995194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A novel featureless approach to mass detection in digital mammograms based on support vector machines.
Campanini R; Dongiovanni D; Iampieri E; Lanconelli N; Masotti M; Palermo G; Riccardi A; Roffilli M
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(6):961-75. PubMed ID: 15104319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computerized-aid diagnosis of breast mass using ultrasound image.
Tian JW; Sun LT; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Zhang YT
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3158-64. PubMed ID: 17879777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesions.
Gundreddy RR; Tan M; Qiu Y; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4241-9. PubMed ID: 26133622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computer aided detection of clusters of microcalcifications on full field digital mammograms.
Ge J; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2975-88. PubMed ID: 16964876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative analysis of breast cancer detection in mammograms and thermograms.
Milosevic M; Jankovic D; Peulic A
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Feb; 60(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 25720034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Joint two-view information for computerized detection of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Ge J; Wei J; Zhou C
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2574-85. PubMed ID: 16898462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information.
Shi J; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Nees A; Wu YT; Wei J; Zhou C; Zhang Y; Cui J
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):280-90. PubMed ID: 18293583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of cancerous masses in mammograms by template matching: optimization of template brightness distribution by means of evolutionary algorithm.
Bator M; Nieniewski M
J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):162-72. PubMed ID: 21748410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.
Pereira RR; Azevedo Marques PM; Honda MO; Kinoshita SK; Engelmann R; Muramatsu C; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 17122993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
