157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17090166)
1. Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types.
Bock N; Pancherz H
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):930-41. PubMed ID: 17090166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusal stability after Herbst treatment of patients with retrognathic and prognathic facial types : A pilot study.
Bock NC; Gnandt E; Ruf S
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 May; 77(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 26935963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Barnett GA; Higgins DW; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 18251608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Occlusal stability of adult Class II Division 1 treatment with the Herbst appliance.
Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 20691355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients.
Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
Bock N; Ruf S
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of individual mandibular changes induced by functional jaw orthopedics followed by fixed appliances in Class II patients.
Franchi L; Baccetti T
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):950-4. PubMed ID: 17090170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Treatment of Angle Class II/1 malocclusions with the Herbst appliance].
Soytarhan A; Işiksal E
Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1990 Apr; 3(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 2101668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early treatment of a severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Taner-Sarisoy L
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 23(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10023229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Class II Division 1 case treated with the Herbst and Edgewise appliances.
So LL
Aust Orthod J; 1996 Mar; 14(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 9063114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Herbst-multibracket appliance treatment more efficient in adolescents than in adults?
von Bremen J; Bock N; Ruf S
Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):173-7. PubMed ID: 19123697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
