375 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17090186)
1. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update.
Coindre JM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 Oct; 130(10):1448-53. PubMed ID: 17090186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonrhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas of childhood: formulation of a simplified system for grading.
Parham DM; Webber BL; Jenkins JJ; Cantor AB; Maurer HM
Mod Pathol; 1995 Sep; 8(7):705-10. PubMed ID: 8539226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Federation Nationale des Centers de Lutte Contre le Cancer grading of soft tissue sarcomas on needle core biopsies using surrogate markers.
Lin X; Davion S; Bertsch EC; Omar I; Nayar R; Laskin WB
Hum Pathol; 2016 Oct; 56():147-54. PubMed ID: 27346575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reproducibility of histologic diagnosis and grading for adult soft-tissue sarcomas.
Hasegawa T; Yamamoto S; Nojima T; Hirose T; Nikaido T; Yamashiro K; Matsuno Y
Hum Pathol; 2002 Jan; 33(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 11823981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sampling modality influences the predictive value of grading in adult soft tissue extremity sarcomas.
Khoja H; Griffin A; Dickson B; Wunder J; Ferguson P; Howarth D; Kandel R
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1774-9. PubMed ID: 24283858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Histologic prognostication in soft tissue sarcomas: grading versus subtyping or both? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed practical guidelines.
Kilpatrick SE
Ann Diagn Pathol; 1999 Feb; 3(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 9990113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of soft tissue sarcomas. A cytomorphologic analysis with emphasis on histologic subtyping, grading, and therapeutic significance.
Kilpatrick SE; Ward WG; Cappellari JO; Bos GD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 10439797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading in soft tissue tumors: principles and problems.
Oliveira AM; Nascimento AG
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Oct; 30(10):543-59. PubMed ID: 11685477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is fine-needle aspiration biopsy a practical alternative to open biopsy for the primary diagnosis of sarcoma? Experience with 140 patients.
Kilpatrick SE; Cappellari JO; Bos GD; Gold SH; Ward WG
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jan; 115(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 11190808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: from histological to molecular assessment.
Neuville A; Chibon F; Coindre JM
Pathology; 2014 Feb; 46(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 24378389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ki-67 immunoexpression and radiological assessment of necrosis improves accuracy of conventional and modified core biopsy systems in predicting the final grade assigned to adult-soft tissue sarcomas. An international collaborative study.
Machado I; Cruz J; Righi A; Gambarotti M; Ferrari C; Ruengwanichayakun P; Giner F; Rausell N; Lavernia J; Sugita S; Najera L; Suarez L; Sanjuan X; García JAN; García Del Muro FJ; Gómez-Mateo MC; Valladares MM; Ramos-Oliver I; Romagosa C; Parafioriti A; Elisabetta A; di Bernardo A; Navarro S; Hasegawa T; Arana E; Llombart-Bosch A
Pathol Res Pract; 2021 Sep; 225():153562. PubMed ID: 34329836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of cytological grading of spindle-cell sarcomas.
Mathur S; Kapila K; Verma K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Aug; 29(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 12889044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Adequacy of Core Biopsy in the Assessment of Smooth Muscle Neoplasms of Soft Tissues: Implications for Treatment and Prognosis.
Schneider N; Strauss DC; Smith MJ; Miah AB; Zaidi S; Benson C; van Houdt WJ; Jones RL; Hayes AJ; Fisher C; Thway K
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Jul; 41(7):923-931. PubMed ID: 28505003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bastiaannet E; Groen H; Jager PL; Cobben DC; van der Graaf WT; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra HJ
Cancer Treat Rev; 2004 Feb; 30(1):83-101. PubMed ID: 14766127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Problems in grading soft tissue sarcomas.
Brown FM; Fletcher CD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S82-9. PubMed ID: 11996174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified staging system for extremity soft tissue sarcomas.
Ramanathan RC; A'Hern R; Fisher C; Thomas JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 1999; 6(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 10030416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dedifferentiation in bone and soft tissue sarcomas: How do we define it? What is prognostically relevant?
Dry SM
Hum Pathol; 2024 May; 147():139-147. PubMed ID: 38311185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The grading of soft tissue sarcomas. Results of a clinicohistopathologic correlation in a series of 163 cases.
Costa J; Wesley RA; Glatstein E; Rosenberg SA
Cancer; 1984 Feb; 53(3):530-41. PubMed ID: 6692258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of clinicopathologic prognostic factors for 157 uterine sarcomas and evaluation of a grading score validated for soft tissue sarcoma.
Pautier P; Genestie C; Rey A; Morice P; Roche B; Lhommé C; Haie-Meder C; Duvillard P
Cancer; 2000 Mar; 88(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10717626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histological grading and MIB-1 labeling index of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Hasegawa T
Pathol Int; 2007 Mar; 57(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 17295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
