390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17090280)
21. A prospective trial of variable stiffness colonoscopes with different tip diameters in unsedated patients.
Chen PJ; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY; Chao YC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18513270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.
Radaelli F; Meucci G; Sgroi G; Minoli G;
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1122-30. PubMed ID: 18445096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improvement in caecal intubation rate and pain reduction by using 3-dimensional magnetic imaging for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized trial of patients referred for colonoscopy.
Hoff G; Bretthauer M; Dahler S; Huppertz-Hauss G; Sauar J; Paulsen J; Seip B; Moritz V
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 17558914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.
Rex DK; Goodwine BW
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 May; 97(5):1148-51. PubMed ID: 12014719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Patient factors predictive of pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy: a prospective study in Korea.
Chung YW; Han DS; Yoo KS; Park CK
Dig Liver Dis; 2007 Sep; 39(9):872-6. PubMed ID: 17652041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Randomized trial of standard versus magnetic endoscope imaging colonoscopes for unsedated colonoscopy.
Shergill AK; McQuaid KR; Deleon A; McAnanama M; Shah JN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1031-1036.e1. PubMed ID: 22381532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Improvement in colonoscopy performance with adjunctive magnetic endoscope imaging: a randomized controlled trial.
Cheung HY; Chung CC; Kwok SY; Tsang WW; Li MK
Endoscopy; 2006 Mar; 38(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 16528645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.
Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sedation-free colonoscopy.
Takahashi Y; Tanaka H; Kinjo M; Sakumoto K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Apr; 48(4):855-9. PubMed ID: 15768182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Push enteroscopy has a 96% cecal intubation rate in colonoscopies that failed because of redundant colons.
Jackson CS; Haq T; Olafsson S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Aug; 74(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21689815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy.
Takahashi Y; Tanaka H; Kinjo M; Sakumoto K
Dis Colon Rectum; 2005 Jun; 48(6):1295-300. PubMed ID: 15793639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Remifentanil vs. meperidine for patient-controlled analgesia during colonoscopy: a randomized double-blind trial.
Fanti L; Agostoni M; Gemma M; Gambino G; Facciorusso A; Guslandi M; Torri G; Testoni PA
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1119-24. PubMed ID: 19337241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation.
Leung CW; Kaltenbach T; Soetikno R; Wu KK; Leung FW; Friedland S
Endoscopy; 2010 Jul; 42(7):557-63. PubMed ID: 20593332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers.
Rösch T; Adler A; Pohl H; Wettschureck E; Koch M; Wiedenmann B; Hoepffner N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1139-46. PubMed ID: 18355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors that predict cecal insertion time during sedated colonoscopy: the role of waist circumference.
Hsieh YH; Kuo CS; Tseng KC; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Feb; 23(2):215-7. PubMed ID: 18289354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Electroacupuncture analgesia for colonoscopy. a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Fanti L; Gemma M; Passaretti S; Guslandi M; Testoni PA; Casati A; Torri G
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Feb; 98(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 12591047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of glucagon and scopolamine butylbromide as premedication for colonoscopy in unsedated patients.
Yoshikawa I; Yamasaki M; Taguchi M; Kanda K; Tashiro M; Kume K; Tabaru A; Otsuki M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Sep; 49(9):1393-8. PubMed ID: 16699970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial.
Fatima H; Rex DK; Rothstein R; Rahmani E; Nehme O; Dewitt J; Helper D; Toor A; Bensen S
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jan; 6(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 18065277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
