These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17090556)

  • 1. Can a center for comparative effectiveness information succeed? Perspectives from a health care company.
    Buto K; Juhn P
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w586-8. PubMed ID: 17090556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Getting to 'smart' health care.
    Clancy CM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w589-92. PubMed ID: 17090557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information.
    Wilensky GR
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w572-85. PubMed ID: 17090555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The emerging context for advances in comparative effectiveness assessment.
    Rowe JW; Cortese DA; McGinnis JM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(6):w593-5. PubMed ID: 17090558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Technology assessment in healthcare: a review and description of a "best practice" technology assessment process.
    Fernandez AM; Schrogie JJ; Wilson WW; Nash DB
    Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(6):240-53. PubMed ID: 9543920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health technology assessment in Switzerland.
    Koch P; Schilling J; Läubli M; Mitscherlich F; Melchart D; Bellucci S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():174-7. PubMed ID: 19534839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing medical technology assessment: past, present, and future.
    Foote SB
    Milbank Q; 1987; 65(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 3600552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis and innovation.
    Jena AB; Philipson TJ
    J Health Econ; 2008 Sep; 27(5):1224-36. PubMed ID: 18619695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Care to compare?
    Aston G
    Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):38-41, 1. PubMed ID: 19209502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The National Technical Information Service: a Federal resource for health information and services.
    Bracken DD
    J Am Soc Inf Sci; 1987 Jan; 38(1):65-7. PubMed ID: 10280919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring opportunities for collaboration between the corporate sector and the dental education community.
    Alexander D; Clarkson J; Buchanan R; Chadwick G; Chesters R; Drisko CL; Douglass CW; Farrell L; Fletcher K; Makoni F; Monaco M; Nordquist B; Park NI; Riggs S; Schou L; Smales FC; Stamm JW; Toh CG; Volpe T; Ward P; Warren P
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():64-73. PubMed ID: 18289269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health care decision-making.
    Magel JS
    Physician Exec; 1990; 16(3):31-2. PubMed ID: 10113233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ensuring technological competence and leadership in medicine.
    McGivney WT
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 10125939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public-private partnerships in community health centers: addressing the needs of underserved populations.
    Shi L; Collins PB
    Organ Ethic; 2007; 4(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 18193771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Challenges ahead for federal technology assessment.
    Neumann PJ
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(2):w150-2. PubMed ID: 17259197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in the Medicare home health care market: the impact of reimbursement policy.
    Choi S; Davitt JK
    Med Care; 2009 Mar; 47(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 19194328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project: a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways.
    Gooch KL; Smith D; Wasylak T; Faris PD; Marshall DA; Khong H; Hibbert JE; Parker RD; Zernicke RF; Beaupre L; Pearce T; Johnston DW; Frank CB
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Apr; 25(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 19366494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.