These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17090879)

  • 1. Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes.
    Gupta V; Sony P; Agarwal HC; Sihota R; Sharma A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 54(4):261-5. PubMed ID: 17090879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Tonnu PA; Ho T; Newson T; El Sheikh A; Sharma K; White E; Bunce C; Garway-Heath D
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jul; 89(7):851-4. PubMed ID: 15965165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology.
    Browning AC; Bhan A; Rotchford AP; Shah S; Dua HS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Nov; 88(11):1395-9. PubMed ID: 15489480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer, and Tono-Pen.
    Bhan A; Browning AC; Shah S; Hamilton R; Dave D; Dua HS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1389-92. PubMed ID: 11980851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.
    Kamel K; Dervan E; Falzon K; O'Brien C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 188(1):321-325. PubMed ID: 29616408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Goldmann applanation, non-contact, dynamic contour and tonopen tonometry measurements in healthy and glaucomatous eyes, and effect of central corneal thickness on the measurement results.
    Yildiz A; Yasar T
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2018 Aug; 15(2):152-157. PubMed ID: 30047543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.
    Ko YC; Liu CJ; Hsu WM
    Eye (Lond); 2005 Mar; 19(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 15258603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
    Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness.
    Porwal AC; Shrishrimal M; Punamia RP; Mathew BC
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1927-1931. PubMed ID: 37203058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive eyes.
    Marini M; Da Pozzo S; Accardo A; Canziani T
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 20890884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of central corneal thickness on measured intraocular pressure differentials: Nidek RKT-7700, Topcon CT-80 NCTs and Goldmann Tonometer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Mucke S; Osuagwu UL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Nov; 32(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 23009324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.
    Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects.
    Bang SP; Lee CE; Kim YC
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):199. PubMed ID: 29096616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects.
    Güler M; Bilak Ş; Bilgin B; Şimşek A; Çapkin M; Hakim Reyhan A
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):613-8. PubMed ID: 25264986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Ledoux A; Pourjavan S
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.