These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17091210)

  • 1. Facial motor function monitored by hand held calipers versus computer-assisted photography.
    Clapham L; Bottoms S; Mehta R; Davis A
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2006 Dec; 148(12):1281-7; discussion 1287. PubMed ID: 17091210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction.
    Linstrom CJ
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Jul; 112(7 Pt 1):1129-47. PubMed ID: 12169889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward a universal, automated facial measurement tool in facial reanimation.
    Hadlock TA; Urban LS
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 22508895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Videomimicography: a new objective evaluation of facial motor function].
    Wang DS; Dulguerov P; Lehmann W
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Jan; 39(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 15127569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Palpebral fissure length measurement: accuracy of the FAS facial photographic analysis software and inaccuracy of the ruler.
    Astley SJ
    J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 22(1):e9-e26. PubMed ID: 25594840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concordance of three methods for palpebral fissure length measurement in the assessment of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.
    Cranston ME; Mhanni AA; Marles SL; Chudley AE
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 2009; 16(1):e234-41. PubMed ID: 19372601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Review of objective topographic facial nerve evaluation methods.
    Dulguerov P; Marchal F; Wang D; Gysin C
    Am J Otol; 1999 Sep; 20(5):672-8. PubMed ID: 10503593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective computerized versus subjective analysis of facial synkinesis.
    Wu ZB; Silverman CA; Linstrom CJ; Tessema B; Cosetti MK
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Dec; 115(12):2118-22. PubMed ID: 16369154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anterior segment measurements using digital photography: a simple technique.
    VanRoekel RC; Bower KS; Burka JM; Howard RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 83(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 16772897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical note: Different techniques, different results--a comparison of photogrammetric and caliper-derived measurements.
    Shaner DJ; Bamforth JS; Peterson AE; Beattie OB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1998 Aug; 106(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 9712482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inter-individual variability of the facial morphology during conscious smiling.
    Holberg C; Maier C; Steinhäuser S; Rudzki-Janson I
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):234-43. PubMed ID: 16838092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurements of the periocular facial area with Web-based software.
    Gonzalez F; Castro AF; Schneider K; Lozano M
    J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11(7):347-53. PubMed ID: 16238836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed.
    de Ru JA; Braunius WW; van Benthem PP; Busschers WB; Hordijk GJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):1030-6. PubMed ID: 17006355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods.
    Schimmel M; Christou P; Herrmann F; Müller F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Sep; 34(9):671-8. PubMed ID: 17716266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.