These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. The politics of bioethics. Cohen E; Kristol W Hum Life Rev; 2004; 30(2):7-15. PubMed ID: 15540375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Advisory panel votes for use of embryonic cells in research. Wade N N Y Times Web; 1999 Jun; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11648123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethics and policy in embryonic stem cell research. Robertson JA Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1999 Jun; 9(2):109-36. PubMed ID: 11660628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Standing up for stem cell research. N Y Times Web; 2006 Jul; ():A20. PubMed ID: 16874934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Administrative developments: NIH backs federal funding for stem cell research. Biven M J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 11657149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. President's Council on Bioethics: reproduction and responsibility. Doerflinger RM Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2004; 4(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 15452926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law. Stevens D Houst J Int Law; 2003; 25(3):623-53. PubMed ID: 15199940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Science policy and the law: reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Knowles LP N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy; 2000-2001; 4(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 15011709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. House passes bill relaxing limits on stem cell research. Weiss R Washington Post; 2007 Jan; ():A4. PubMed ID: 17315318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Audio interview: expanding federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research. Interview by Rachel Gotbaum. Hatch OG N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(18):e18. PubMed ID: 17452439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The debate about Dolly. Klotzko AJ Bioethics; 1997 Oct; 11(5):427-38. PubMed ID: 11655121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bioethical catch-22: the moratorium on federal funding of fetal tissue transplantation research and the NIH revitalization amendments. Maroney HM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():485-519. PubMed ID: 10126947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stem cell research in the U.S. after the President's speech of August 2001. Cohen CB Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2004 Mar; 14(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 15250121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Human cloning: a challenge for legislation. Ranson D J Law Med; 2002 May; 9(4):383-5. PubMed ID: 12194467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Embryonic stem cell research: terminological ambiguity may lead to legal obscurity. Hansen B Med Law; 2004; 23(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 15163072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Constitutional constraints on the regulation of cloning. Burt RA Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2009; 9 Suppl():495-506. PubMed ID: 19757717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Bioethics and health law in New Zealand: bioethics commentary. Pickering N N Z Bioeth J; 2002 Feb; 3(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 15587483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]