These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
855 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17091568)
1. Consumer deductibles: how to distribute more equitably the risks of medical malpractice and compensate victims adequately without statutory damage caps. Ledbetter L Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2006; 41(4):1141-61. PubMed ID: 17091568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Turning from damage caps to information disclosure: an alternative to tort reform. Zeiler K Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):385-98. PubMed ID: 15742583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An economic assessment of damage caps in medical malpractice litigation imposed by state laws and the implications for federal policy and law. Frech HE; Hamm WG; Wazzan CP Health Matrix Clevel; 2006; 16(2):693-722. PubMed ID: 16948253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Premium discontent. No reason to cap malpractice insurance: study. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2006 May; 36(20):17. PubMed ID: 16752863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis. Anderson RE Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Are medical malpractice damages caps constitutional? An overview of state litigation. Kelly CN; Mello MM J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(3):515-34. PubMed ID: 16240732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform". Boehm G Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Partnering for malpractice reform. Belfiglio G Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 12675003 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal. Legal experiments. Haugh R Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More than just caps are needed to solve New Jersey's professional liability crisis. Chang L N J Med; 2004 May; 101(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 15185519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical malpractice reform and insurer claims defense: unintended effects? Ambrose JM; Carroll A J Health Polit Policy Law; 2007 Oct; 32(5):843-65. PubMed ID: 17855719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Defending the practice of medicine. Anderson RE Arch Intern Med; 2004 Jun; 164(11):1173-8. PubMed ID: 15197041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care? Chupkovich PJ J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():337-75. PubMed ID: 10126943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes. Dwyer CL Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compensating medical injury victims in the United States: there must be a better way. Costello M Hosp Top; 2005; 83(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 16092633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care in crisis: the need for medical liability reform. Palmisano DJ Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):371-83. PubMed ID: 15742582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Lessons learned from the "laboratories of democracy": a critique of federal medical liability reform. Conroy AD Cornell Law Rev; 2006 Jul; 91(5):1159-202. PubMed ID: 16827219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of California's Medical Injury Compensation Review Act (MICRA). Evans MB J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 19(6):329-30. PubMed ID: 15293664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]