These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17093475)

  • 1. Small company mergers--good for whom?
    Maybeck V; Bains W
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1343-8. PubMed ID: 17093475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UK biotech sector loses flagship PowderJect to Chiron.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jul; 21(7):717. PubMed ID: 12833073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Companies jostle for access to public markets.
    Bouchie A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1413-4. PubMed ID: 14647309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antisoma-Roche deal--a new kind of buyout?
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):3. PubMed ID: 12511894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolving symbiosis--venture capital and biotechnology.
    Bradford TC
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 12949556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. This means war.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):954. PubMed ID: 18779784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biotech IPOs: handle with care.
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1437. PubMed ID: 14647322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hedge funds gain edge by doubling biotech investments.
    Ransom J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Apr; 24(4):373-4. PubMed ID: 16601707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US government previews biotech survey.
    Goho A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):837-8. PubMed ID: 12894185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hyseq-Variagenics merger signals end of the line.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 12511895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biotech holds its own in Q2.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):938. PubMed ID: 15286634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is your biotech giving away the store?
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1079. PubMed ID: 12410245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biotech holds steady in Q4.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 14755275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biotech IPOs--flop or pop?
    Jacobs T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):949. PubMed ID: 15286641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lack of private financing hobbles emerging biotech regions.
    Jia H; Jayarama KS; Astvatsaturyan M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Jan; 24(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 16404378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits of biotech clusters questioned.
    Sheridan C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Nov; 21(11):1258-9. PubMed ID: 14595343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chasing biotech, state by state--winners and losers.
    Wilan KH
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 15696143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biotech financing retrenches in Q2.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 24(8):883. PubMed ID: 16900116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Japanese giants renew interest in industrial biotech.
    Sipp D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Mar; 23(3):275-6. PubMed ID: 15765071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biotechs hold their own in shifting industry.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Nov; 20(11):1065-6. PubMed ID: 12410238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.