222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094033)
1. A widely applicable protocol for DNA isolation from fecal samples.
Zhang BW; Li M; Ma LC; Wei FW
Biochem Genet; 2006 Dec; 44(11-12):503-12. PubMed ID: 17094033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An effective method for isolation of DNA from pig faeces and comparison of five different methods.
Tang JN; Zeng ZG; Wang HN; Yang T; Zhang PJ; Li YL; Zhang AY; Fan WQ; Zhang Y; Yang X; Zhao SJ; Tian GB; Zou LK
J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Dec; 75(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 18700153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experiments in DNA extraction and PCR amplification from bighorn sheep feces: the importance of DNA extraction method.
Wehausen JD; Ramey RR; Epps CW
J Hered; 2004; 95(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 15475396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples.
Psifidi A; Dovas CI; Banos G
Mol Cell Probes; 2010 Apr; 24(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 19900535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Universal mitochondrial PCR combined with species-specific dot-blot assay as a source-tracking method of human, bovine, chicken, ovine, and porcine in fecal-contaminated surface water.
Kortbaoui R; Locas A; Imbeau M; Payment P; Villemur R
Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2002-10. PubMed ID: 19249072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of strategies for the isolation of PCR-compatible, genomic DNA from a municipal biogas plants.
Weiss A; Jérôme V; Freitag R
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2007 Jun; 853(1-2):190-7. PubMed ID: 17442638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rapid isolation of DNA from fossil and museum specimens suitable for PCR.
Cano RJ; Poinar HN
Biotechniques; 1993 Sep; 15(3):432-4, 436. PubMed ID: 8217155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the quality and quantity of genomic DNA recovered from canine blood samples by three different extraction methods.
Clements DN; Wood S; Carter SD; Ollier WE
Res Vet Sci; 2008 Aug; 85(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 18031774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simple preparation method of PCR fragments for automated DNA sequencing.
Høgdall E; Boye K; Vuust J
J Cell Biochem; 1999 Jun; 73(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 10733337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of chicken-specific fecal microbial sequences using a metagenomic approach.
Lu J; Santo Domingo J; Shanks OC
Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3561-74. PubMed ID: 17582456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-blood polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism: a simplified method by microwave irradiation.
Jadaon MM; Dashti AA; Lewis HL; Habeeb FM
Med Princ Pract; 2009; 18(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 19494534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species-specific identification by inhibitor-controlled PCR of ruminant components contaminating industrial crude porcine heparin.
Huang Q; Yao CY; Chen B; Wang F; Huang JF; Zhang X; Fu WL
Mol Cell Probes; 2006; 20(3-4):250-8. PubMed ID: 16563696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of eukaryotic mitochondrial DNA to differentiate human, bovine, porcine and ovine sources in fecally contaminated surface water.
Martellini A; Payment P; Villemur R
Water Res; 2005 Feb; 39(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 15707626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantification of host-specific Bacteroides-Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater.
Okabe S; Okayama N; Savichtcheva O; Ito T
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 74(4):890-901. PubMed ID: 17139508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth.
Rohland N; Hofreiter M
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(7):1756-62. PubMed ID: 17641642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fecal collection, ambient preservation, and DNA extraction for PCR amplification of bacterial and human markers from human feces.
Nechvatal JM; Ram JL; Basson MD; Namprachan P; Niec SR; Badsha KZ; Matherly LH; Majumdar AP; Kato I
J Microbiol Methods; 2008 Feb; 72(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 18162191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Testing the reliability of noninvasive genetic sampling by comparing analyses of blood and fecal samples in Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus).
Lathuillière M; Ménard N; Gautier-Hion A; Crouau-Roy B
Am J Primatol; 2001 Nov; 55(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 11746278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative method for DNA extraction and PCR identification of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar in fecal samples.
Vianna EN; Costa JO; Santos CK; Cury MC; Silva EF; Costa AO; Gomes MA
Parasitology; 2009 Jun; 136(7):765-9. PubMed ID: 19486545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Toward a microchip-based solid-phase extraction method for isolation of nucleic acids.
Wolfe KA; Breadmore MC; Ferrance JP; Power ME; Conroy JF; Norris PM; Landers JP
Electrophoresis; 2002 Mar; 23(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 11891705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on.
Chomczynski P; Sacchi N
Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(2):581-5. PubMed ID: 17406285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
