BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094141)

  • 1. Role of geographic information systems in birth defects surveillance and research.
    Siffel C; Strickland MJ; Gardner BR; Kirby RS; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 17094141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey.
    Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA;
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying geocode location error using GIS methods.
    Strickland MJ; Siffel C; Gardner BR; Berzen AK; Correa A
    Environ Health; 2007 Apr; 6():10. PubMed ID: 17408484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of residential geocoding methods in population-based study of air quality and birth defects.
    Gilboa SM; Mendola P; Olshan AF; Harness C; Loomis D; Langlois PH; Savitz DA; Herring AH
    Environ Res; 2006 Jun; 101(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16483563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of the automated spatial surveillance program to birth defects surveillance data.
    Gardner BR; Strickland MJ; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Jul; 79(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 17385687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system.
    Miller E
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services.
    Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State.
    Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Birth certificates as a source for fetal alcohol syndrome case ascertainment--Georgia, 1989-1992.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1995 Apr; 44(13):251-3. PubMed ID: 7898420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using geographic information systems to design population-based interventions.
    Caley LM
    Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 15566560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using active birth defects surveillance programs to supplement data on fetal death reports: improving surveillance data on stillbirths.
    Duke W; Williams L; Correa A
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):799-804. PubMed ID: 18985684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GIS and epidemiology.
    Ruankaew N
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88(11):1735-8. PubMed ID: 16471128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinician reviewers in birth defects surveillance programs: survey of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network.
    Lin AE; Forrester MB; Cunniff C; Higgins CA; Anderka M
    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):781-6. PubMed ID: 17051528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program surveillance data, 1988-1991.
    Teratology; 1993 Dec; 48(6):695-709. PubMed ID: 8115977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects--Atlanta, Georgia, 1978-2005.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Jan; 57(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18185492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Application of capture-mark-recapture method on evaluating the abilities of birth defects surveillance systems].
    Yin XQ; Li YM; Luo JY; Shi XJ; Yin T; Huang R; Chen J
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 29(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 18686856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India.
    Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S
    Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.