BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094263)

  • 1. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
    De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association studies with SNPbrowser software.
    De La Vega FM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 376():177-93. PubMed ID: 17984546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
    Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
    Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
    Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
    Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
    Hao K
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection of SNP subsets for association studies in candidate genes: comparison of the power of different strategies to detect single disease susceptibility locus effects.
    Cousin E; Deleuze JF; Genin E
    BMC Genet; 2006 Apr; 7():20. PubMed ID: 16597333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of two flexible and compatible SNP genotyping platforms: TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays and the SNPlex Genotyping System.
    De la Vega FM; Lazaruk KD; Rhodes MD; Wenz MH
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jun; 573(1-2):111-35. PubMed ID: 15829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNP-VISTA: an interactive SNP visualization tool.
    Shah N; Teplitsky MV; Minovitsky S; Pennacchio LA; Hugenholtz P; Hamann B; Dubchak IL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():292. PubMed ID: 16336665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patterns of linkage disequilibrium between SNPs in a Sardinian population isolate and the selection of markers for association studies.
    Angius A; Hyland FC; Persico I; Pirastu N; Woodage T; Pirastu M; De la Vega FM
    Hum Hered; 2008; 65(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 17652959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TagSNP selection based on pairwise LD criteria and power analysis in association studies.
    Gopalakrishnan S; Qin ZS
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():511-22. PubMed ID: 17094265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation of gene-based SNPs and linkage disequilibrium patterns in the human genome.
    Tsunoda T; Lathrop GM; Sekine A; Yamada R; Takahashi A; Ohnishi Y; Tanaka T; Nakamura Y
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Aug; 13(15):1623-32. PubMed ID: 15190013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Navigating the HapMap.
    Barnes MR
    Brief Bioinform; 2006 Sep; 7(3):211-24. PubMed ID: 16877472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
    Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of an algorithm of tagging SNPs selection by linkage disequilibrium.
    Tang NL; Pharoah PD; Ma SL; Easton DF
    Clin Biochem; 2006 Mar; 39(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 16427037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment and implications of linkage disequilibrium in genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism and microsatellite panels.
    Goode EL; Jarvik GP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():S72-6. PubMed ID: 16342185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transferability of tag SNPs to capture common genetic variation in DNA repair genes across multiple populations.
    De Bakker PI; Graham RR; Altshuler D; Henderson BE; Haiman CA
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():478-86. PubMed ID: 17094262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.
    Horne BD; Camp NJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 14691953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-objective tag SNPs selection using evolutionary algorithms.
    Ting CK; Lin WT; Huang YT
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(11):1446-52. PubMed ID: 20385729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating coverage of exons by HapMap SNPs.
    Dong X; Zhong T; Xu T; Xia Y; Li B; Li C; Yuan L; Ding G; Li Y
    Genomics; 2013 Jan; 101(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 23000193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.