BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094343)

  • 1. Efficient design and analysis of biospecimens with measurements subject to detection limit.
    Vexler A; Liu A; Schisterman EF
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(5):780-91. PubMed ID: 17094343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.
    Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):486-96. PubMed ID: 18782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid pooled-unpooled design for cost-efficient measurement of biomarkers.
    Schisterman EF; Vexler A; Mumford SL; Perkins NJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Feb; 29(5):597-613. PubMed ID: 20049693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pooling biospecimens and limits of detection: effects on ROC curve analysis.
    Mumford SL; Schisterman EF; Vexler A; Liu A
    Biostatistics; 2006 Oct; 7(4):585-98. PubMed ID: 16531470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of interaction effects using pooled biospecimens in a case-control study.
    Danaher MR; Albert PS; Roy A; Schisterman EF
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1502-13. PubMed ID: 26553532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semiparametric regression models for a right-skewed outcome subject to pooling.
    Mitchell EM; Lyles RH; Manatunga AK; Schisterman EF
    Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 181(7):541-8. PubMed ID: 25737248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
    Vexler A; Liu A; Eliseeva E; Schisterman EF
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):895-903. PubMed ID: 18047527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A semiparametric method for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
    Yin L; Diao G; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4141-4152. PubMed ID: 28744876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation and testing based on data subject to measurement errors: from parametric to non-parametric likelihood methods.
    Vexler A; Tsai WM; Malinovsky Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2498-512. PubMed ID: 21805485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positing, fitting, and selecting regression models for pooled biomarker data.
    Mitchell EM; Lyles RH; Schisterman EF
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(17):2544-58. PubMed ID: 25846980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regression for skewed biomarker outcomes subject to pooling.
    Mitchell EM; Lyles RH; Manatunga AK; Danaher M; Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 24521420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An efficient design strategy for logistic regression using outcome- and covariate-dependent pooling of biospecimens prior to assay.
    Lyles RH; Mitchell EM; Weinberg CR; Umbach DM; Schisterman EF
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):965-75. PubMed ID: 26964741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 165(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 17110640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A general framework for the regression analysis of pooled biomarker assessments.
    Liu Y; McMahan C; Gallagher C
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2363-2377. PubMed ID: 28349583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-subject Pooling of Biological Samples to Reduce Exposure Misclassification in Biomarker-based Studies.
    Perrier F; Giorgis-Allemand L; Slama R; Philippat C
    Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 27035688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accelerated failure time model for case-cohort design with longitudinal covariates subject to measurement error and detection limits.
    Dong X; Kong L; Wahed AS
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1327-39. PubMed ID: 26530415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A highly efficient design strategy for regression with outcome pooling.
    Mitchell EM; Lyles RH; Manatunga AK; Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):5028-40. PubMed ID: 25220822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Specimen pooling for efficient use of biospecimens in studies of time to a common event.
    Saha-Chaudhuri P; Weinberg CR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 178(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 23821316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of skewed exposure in case-control studies with pooling.
    Whitcomb BW; Perkins NJ; Zhang Z; Ye A; Lyles RH
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2461-72. PubMed ID: 22437722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group testing can improve the cost-efficiency of prospective-retrospective biomarker studies.
    Zhang W; Zhang Z; Krushkal J; Liu A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Mar; 21(1):55. PubMed ID: 33740890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.