399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094743)
1. Long-term success of antegrade endopyelotomy compared with pyeloplasty at a single institution.
Dimarco DS; Gettman MT; McGee SM; Chow GK; Leroy AJ; Slezak J; Patterson DE; Segura JW
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):707-12. PubMed ID: 17094743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endopyelotomy review.
Bernardo N; Smith AD
Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution.
Knudsen BE; Cook AJ; Watterson JD; Beiko DT; Nott L; Razvi H; Denstedt JD
Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 14972459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
Levin BM; Herrell SD
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy versus redo pyeloplasty.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Skeldon S; Dave S; Bagli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL; Farhat WA
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2571-5; discussion 2575. PubMed ID: 17945304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Indications, technique, and long-term outcome.
Chen RN; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
Urol Clin North Am; 1998 May; 25(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 9633588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of crossing vessels as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the role of antegrade pyelography prior to endopyelotomy.
Wang W; LeRoy AJ; McKusick MA; Segura JW; Patterson DE
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Dec; 15(12):1435-41. PubMed ID: 15590802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade.
Yanke BV; Lallas CD; Pagnani C; McGinnis DE; Bagley DH
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1397-402. PubMed ID: 18707717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction.
Brooks JD; Kavoussi LR; Preminger GM; Schuessler WW; Moore RG
Urology; 1995 Dec; 46(6):791-5. PubMed ID: 7502417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty].
Albqami N; Janetschek G
Ann Urol (Paris); 2006 Dec; 40(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 17214235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy: a single-center experience.
Matin SF; Yost A; Streem SB
J Endourol; 2003 Aug; 17(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 12965067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery.
Basiri A; Behjati S; Zand S; Moghaddam SM
J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. PubMed ID: 17941785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
