BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094755)

  • 1. Cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment options for nephron-sparing surgery.
    Link RE; Permpongkosol S; Gupta A; Jarrett TW; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):782-9. PubMed ID: 17094755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour.
    Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA
    BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1039-42. PubMed ID: 15839927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative cost analysis of robot-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
    Hyams E; Pierorazio P; Mullins JK; Ward M; Allaf M
    J Endourol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):843-7. PubMed ID: 22204599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
    Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: cost comparison with analysis of individual parameters.
    Park S; Pearle MS; Cadeddu JA; Lotan Y
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1449-54. PubMed ID: 18186682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
    Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tumour in solitary kidney: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy vs laparoscopic cryoablation.
    Haber GP; Lee MC; Crouzet S; Kamoi K; Gill IS
    BJU Int; 2012 Jan; 109(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 21895929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass.
    Guillotreau J; Haber GP; Autorino R; Miocinovic R; Hillyer S; Hernandez A; Laydner H; Yakoubi R; Isac W; Long JA; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
    Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):899-904. PubMed ID: 22264680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing costs of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy.
    Alemozaffar M; Chang SL; Kacker R; Sun M; DeWolf WC; Wagner AA
    J Endourol; 2013 May; 27(5):560-5. PubMed ID: 23130756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nephron sparing options for the management of small renal masses.
    Chang SL; Cipriano LE; Harshman LC; Garber AM; Chung BI
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1591-7. PubMed ID: 21419445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results of a prospective study comparing the clinical efficacy of cryoablation of renal cell cancer followed by immediate partial nephrectomy.
    Khoder WY; Siegert S; Stief CG; Becker AJ; Waidelich R
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 40(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 24139636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for multiple ipsilateral renal tumors.
    Lin YC; Turna B; Frota R; Aron M; Haber GP; Kamoi K; Koenig P; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2008 Jun; 53(6):1210-6. PubMed ID: 18375044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy.
    Mir SA; Cadeddu JA; Sleeper JP; Lotan Y
    J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):447-53. PubMed ID: 21247335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of costs and morbidity associated with laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating small renal tumours.
    Bensalah K; Zeltser I; Tuncel A; Cadeddu J; Lotan Y
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 17922853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy in consecutive patients: the Cornell experience.
    Schiff JD; Palese M; Vaughan ED; Sosa RE; Coll D; Del Pizzo JJ
    BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 16153207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses.
    O'Malley RL; Berger AD; Kanofsky JA; Phillips CK; Stifelman M; Taneja SS
    BJU Int; 2007 Feb; 99(2):395-8. PubMed ID: 17092288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours part I: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
    Aron M; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2007 Feb; 51(2):337-46; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 17095144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic renal cryoablation for small (<3.5 cm) cortical renal masses.
    Haramis G; Graversen JA; Mues AC; Korets R; Rosales JC; Okhunov Z; Badani KK; Gupta M; Landman J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Mar; 22(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 22145574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer.
    Heuer R; Gill IS; Guazzoni G; Kirkali Z; Marberger M; Richie JP; de la Rosette JJ
    Eur Urol; 2010 Feb; 57(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 19853989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.