1051 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17094760)
1. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical modifications for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Mendez-Torres F; Woods M; Thomas R
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):393-6. PubMed ID: 15865534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: University of Miami experience with the daVinci Surgical System.
Siddiq FM; Leveillee RJ; Villicana P; Bird VG
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 15865533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Braga LH; Pace K; DeMaria J; Lorenzo AJ
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):848-57. PubMed ID: 19359084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients.
Rasool S; Singh M; Jain S; Chaddha S; Tyagi V; Pahwa M; Pandey H
J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):325-329. PubMed ID: 31222624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: a combined experience.
Palese MA; Stifelman MD; Munver R; Sosa RE; Philipps CK; Dinlenc C; Del Pizzo JJ
J Endourol; 2005 Apr; 19(3):382-6. PubMed ID: 15865532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
Levin BM; Herrell SD
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?
Asensio M; Gander R; Royo GF; Lloret J
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):69.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25791423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery.
Basiri A; Behjati S; Zand S; Moghaddam SM
J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. PubMed ID: 17941785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative comparison of robotic assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) pyeloplasty versus conventional LESS pyeloplasty.
Olweny EO; Park SK; Tan YK; Gurbuz C; Cadeddu JA; Best SL
Eur Urol; 2012 Feb; 61(2):410-4. PubMed ID: 22036645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.
Yee DS; Shanberg AM; Duel BP; Rodriguez E; Eichel L; Rajpoot D
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):599-602. PubMed ID: 16504272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study.
Riachy E; Cost NG; Defoor WR; Reddy PP; Minevich EA; Noh PH
J Urol; 2013 Jan; 189(1):283-7. PubMed ID: 23174238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures.
Iwamura M; Soh S; Irie A; Kadowaki K; Matsusita Y; Fujioka T; Baba S
Int J Urol; 2004 Jul; 11(7):449-55. PubMed ID: 15242351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with previously failed open surgical repair.
Hemal AK; Mishra S; Mukharjee S; Suryavanshi M
Int J Urol; 2008 Aug; 15(8):744-6. PubMed ID: 18786197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
