190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17095516)
1. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval.
Holte J; Berglund L; Milton K; Garello C; Gennarelli G; Revelli A; Bergh T
Hum Reprod; 2007 Feb; 22(2):548-57. PubMed ID: 17095516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Which set of embryo variables is most predictive for live birth? A prospective study in 6252 single embryo transfers to construct an embryo score for the ranking and selection of embryos.
Rhenman A; Berglund L; Brodin T; Olovsson M; Milton K; Hadziosmanovic N; Holte J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 25376459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Nuclear status of day 2 preembryos affects embryo quality and implantation potential].
Liu Q; Zhu GJ; Hu J; Wei YL; Ren XL; Zhang HW; Li YF; Jin L; Yue J
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Jan; 14(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 18297807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Zygote transfer on day 1 versus cleavage stage embryo transfer on day 3: a prospective randomized trial.
Jaroudi K; Al-Hassan S; Sieck U; Al-Sufyan H; Al-Kabra M; Coskun S
Hum Reprod; 2004 Mar; 19(3):645-8. PubMed ID: 14998964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) and standard day 2 or 3 embryo morphology with regard to assisted reproductive technique outcomes.
Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK
Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 16213842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates.
Scott L; Finn A; O'Leary T; McLellan S; Hill J
Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):230-40. PubMed ID: 16982662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers.
Van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Kester AD; Evers JL
Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2103-8. PubMed ID: 15243008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of pronuclear zygote morphology and early cleavage status of zygotes as additional criteria in the selection of day 3 embryos: a randomized study.
Chen C; Kattera S
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 16595210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential analysis of zona thickness during in vitro culture of human zygotes: correlation with embryo quality, age, and implantation.
Garside WT; Loret de Mola JR; Bucci JA; Tureck RW; Heyner S
Mol Reprod Dev; 1997 May; 47(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 9110320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.
Meseguer M; Herrero J; Tejera A; Hilligsøe KM; Ramsing NB; Remohí J
Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2658-71. PubMed ID: 21828117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical application of a modified pronuclear stage scoring system following conventional in-vitro fertilization].
Xu YW; Zhuang GL; Fang C; Shu YM; Zhang MF; Peng WL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 38(6):343-5. PubMed ID: 12895376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embryo transfer is equally effective at cleavage stage and blastocyst stage: a randomized prospective study.
Hreinsson J; Rosenlund B; Fridström M; Ek I; Levkov L; Sjöblom P; Hovatta O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 15541857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [GnRH antagonists and embryo implantation potential].
Giorgetti C
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Oct; 33(6 Pt 2):3S36-8. PubMed ID: 15643686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing the number of cleavage stage embryos to transfer on day 3 in women 38 years of age and older: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database study.
Stern JE; Goldman MB; Hatasaka H; MacKenzie TA; Surrey ES; Racowsky C;
Fertil Steril; 2009 Mar; 91(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 18321489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An embryo cleavage pattern based on the relative blastomere size as a function of cell number for predicting implantation outcome.
Sela R; Samuelov L; Almog B; Schwartz T; Cohen T; Amit A; Azem F; Ben-Yosef D
Fertil Steril; 2012 Sep; 98(3):650-656.e4. PubMed ID: 22749226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients.
Thurin A; Hardarson T; Hausken J; Jablonowska B; Lundin K; Pinborg A; Bergh C
Hum Reprod; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1876-80. PubMed ID: 15774540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers.
Feil D; Henshaw RC; Lane M
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1505-10. PubMed ID: 18292597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early cleavage morphology affects the quality and implantation potential of day 3 embryos.
Ciray HN; Karagenç L; Ulug U; Bener F; Bahçeci M
Fertil Steril; 2006 Feb; 85(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 16595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality?
Paternot G; Debrock S; D'Hooghe T; Spiessens C
Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 21782515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Establishment of criteria for elective single embryo transfer at day 2 or day 3 by analyzing cases with successful implantation of all embryos transferred.
Shibahara H; Hirano Y; Okajima T; Shimada K; Kikuchi K; Suzuki T; Takamizawa S; Suzuki M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 17688618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
