80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17095708)
1. A model-based approach to capture genetic variation for future association studies.
Eyheramendy S; Marchini J; McVean G; Myers S; Donnelly P
Genome Res; 2007 Jan; 17(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 17095708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transferability of tag SNPs to capture common genetic variation in DNA repair genes across multiple populations.
De Bakker PI; Graham RR; Altshuler D; Henderson BE; Haiman CA
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():478-86. PubMed ID: 17094262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.
Liu W; Zhao W; Chase GA
Hum Hered; 2006; 61(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 16557026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.
de Bakker PI; Yelensky R; Pe'er I; Gabriel SB; Daly MJ; Altshuler D
Nat Genet; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1217-23. PubMed ID: 16244653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SNPs, haplotypes, and model selection in a candidate gene region: the SIMPle analysis for multilocus data.
Conti DV; Gauderman WJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 27(4):429-41. PubMed ID: 15543635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging space.
Ke X; Miretti MM; Broxholme J; Hunt S; Beck S; Bentley DR; Deloukas P; Cardon LR
Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Sep; 14(18):2757-67. PubMed ID: 16103130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A tool for selecting SNPs for association studies based on observed linkage disequilibrium patterns.
De La Vega FM; Isaac HI; Scafe CR
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2006; ():487-98. PubMed ID: 17094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-wide selection of tag SNPs using multiple-marker correlation.
Hao K
Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 23(23):3178-84. PubMed ID: 18006555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal selection of SNP markers for disease association studies.
Halldórsson BV; Istrail S; De La Vega FM
Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 15812176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Singleton SNPs in the human genome and implications for genome-wide association studies.
Ke X; Taylor MS; Cardon LR
Eur J Hum Genet; 2008 Apr; 16(4):506-15. PubMed ID: 18197193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MLR-tagging: informative SNP selection for unphased genotypes based on multiple linear regression.
He J; Zelikovsky A
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(20):2558-61. PubMed ID: 16895924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fine mapping of disease genes using tagging SNPs.
Sjölander A; Hössjer O; Hartman LW; Humphreys K
Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Nov; 71(Pt 6):815-27. PubMed ID: 17587339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of single SNPs, haplotypes, and whole-genome LD maps on accuracy of association mapping.
Maniatis N; Collins A; Morton NE
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 31(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 17285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accounting for genotyping errors in tagging SNP selection.
Liu W; Yang T; Zhao W; Chase GA
Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17346256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does strong linkage disequilibrium guarantee redundant association results?
Nielsen DM; Suchindran S; Smith CP
Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 32(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 18393391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of gene-based selection of tag SNPs in genome-wide association studies.
Wiltshire S; de Bakker PI; Daly MJ
Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Nov; 14(11):1209-14. PubMed ID: 16804554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimal haplotype block-free selection of tagging SNPs for genome-wide association studies.
Halldórsson BV; Bafna V; Lippert R; Schwartz R; De La Vega FM; Clark AG; Istrail S
Genome Res; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1633-40. PubMed ID: 15289481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transferability of tag SNPs in genetic association studies in multiple populations.
de Bakker PI; Burtt NP; Graham RR; Guiducci C; Yelensky R; Drake JA; Bersaglieri T; Penney KL; Butler J; Young S; Onofrio RC; Lyon HN; Stram DO; Haiman CA; Freedman ML; Zhu X; Cooper R; Groop L; Kolonel LN; Henderson BE; Daly MJ; Hirschhorn JN; Altshuler D
Nat Genet; 2006 Nov; 38(11):1298-303. PubMed ID: 17057720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BNTagger: improved tagging SNP selection using Bayesian networks.
Lee PH; Shatkay H
Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 22(14):e211-9. PubMed ID: 16873474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation.
Horne BD; Camp NJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Jan; 26(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 14691953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
